Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The environment of AGN dwarf galaxies at z$\sim$0.7 from the VIPERS survey

Astrophysics of Galaxies · Submitted 24 Oct 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our work demonstrates that AGN and non-AGN dwarf galaxies reside in similar environments at intermediate redshift suggesting that the environment is not an important factor in triggering AGN activity already since z = 0.9.

how it is stated · asserted 0.64 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2210.13486 (version 1)
Pith IDH4HKA7LR, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJ. Krywult, M. Mezcua, M. Siudek. "The environment of AGN dwarf galaxies at z$\sim$0.7 from the VIPERS survey." arXiv:2210.13486 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/H4HKA7LR
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 8,898 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.98 · states limitation 0.60 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.87 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.81 · compares with prior results 0.67 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Dwarf galaxies are ideal laboratories to study the relationship between the environment and AGN activity. However, the type of environments in which dwarf galaxies hosting AGN reside is still unclear and limited to low-redshift studies (z < 0.5). We use the VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS) to investigate, for the first time, their environments at 0.5 < z < 0.9. We select a sample of 12,942 low-mass ($\rm{log}(M_\mathrm{*}/M_{\odot})\leq10$) galaxies and use the emission-line diagnostic diagram to identify AGN. We characterise their local environments as the galaxy density contrast, $\delta$, derived from the fifth nearest neighbour method. Our work demonstrates that AGN and non-AGN dwarf galaxies reside in similar environments at intermediate redshift suggesting that the environment is not an important factor in triggering AGN activity already since z = 0.9. Dwarf galaxies show a strong preference for low-density environments, independently of whether they host an AGN or not. Their properties do not change when moving to denser environments, suggesting that dwarf galaxies are not gas-enriched due to environmental effects. Moreover, AGN presence does not alter host properties supporting the scenario that AGN feedback does not impact the star formation of the host. Lastly, AGN are found to host over-massive black holes. This is the first study of dwarf galaxies hosting AGN at z > 0.5. The next generation of deep surveys will reveal whether or not such lack of environmental trends is common also for faint higher-redshift dwarf galaxy populations.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Dwarf galaxies are ideal laboratories to study the relationship between the environment and AGN activity. background 1.00 0.05 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 However, the type of environments in which dwarf galaxies hosting AGN reside is still unclear and limited to low-redshift studies (z < 0.5). gap 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 0.97
s2 We use the VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS) to investigate, for the first time, their environments at 0.5 < z < 0.9. contribution 0.80 0.94 0.03 asserted 0.88
s3 We select a sample of 12,942 low-mass ($\rm{log}(M_\mathrm{*}/M_{\odot})\leq10$) galaxies and use the emission-line diagnostic diagram to identify AGN. method 0.99 0.96 0.02 asserted 0.95
s4 We characterise their local environments as the galaxy density contrast, $\delta$, derived from the fifth nearest neighbour method. method 1.00 0.97 0.02 asserted 0.97
s5 Our work demonstrates that AGN and non-AGN dwarf galaxies reside in similar environments at intermediate redshift suggesting that the environment is not an important factor in triggering AGN activity already since z = 0.9. interpretation 0.68 0.95 0.88 asserted 0.64
s6 Dwarf galaxies show a strong preference for low-density environments, independently of whether they host an AGN or not. result 1.00 0.93 0.15 asserted 1.00
s7 Their properties do not change when moving to denser environments, suggesting that dwarf galaxies are not gas-enriched due to environmental effects. interpretation 0.62 0.89 0.08 asserted 0.50
s8 Moreover, AGN presence does not alter host properties supporting the scenario that AGN feedback does not impact the star formation of the host. interpretation 0.71 0.87 0.08 asserted 0.71
s9 Lastly, AGN are found to host over-massive black holes. result 1.00 0.92 0.05 asserted 1.00
s10 This is the first study of dwarf galaxies hosting AGN at z > 0.5. contribution 0.97 0.76 0.04 asserted 1.00
s11 The next generation of deep surveys will reveal whether or not such lack of environmental trends is common also for faint higher-redshift dwarf galaxy populations. future work 1.00 0.06 0.03 hedged possibility 0.71

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.96.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Dwarf galaxies are ideal laboratories to study the relationship between the environment and AGN activity. However, the type of environments in which dwarf galaxies hosting AGN reside is still unclear and limited to low-redshift studies (z < 0.5). We use the VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS) to investigate, for the first time, their environments at 0.5 < z < 0.9. We select a sample of 12,942 low-mass ($\rm{log}(M_\mathrm{*}/M_{\odot})\leq10$) galaxies and use the emission-line diagnostic diagram to identify AGN. We characterise their local environments as the galaxy density contrast, $\delta$, derived from the fifth nearest neighbour method. Our work demonstrates that AGN and non-AGN dwarf galaxies reside in similar environments at intermediate redshift suggesting that the environment is not an important factor in triggering AGN activity already since z = 0.9. Dwarf galaxies show a strong preference for low-density environments, independently of whether they host an AGN or not. Their properties do not change when moving to denser environments, suggesting that dwarf galaxies are not gas-enriched due to environmental effects. Moreover, AGN presence does not alter host properties supporting the scenario that AGN feedback does not impact the star formation of the host. Lastly, AGN are found to host over-massive black holes. This is the first study of dwarf galaxies hosting AGN at z > 0.5. The next generation of deep surveys will reveal whether or not such lack of environmental trends is common also for faint higher-redshift dwarf galaxy populations.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

5 arXiv papers cite this in 5 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 3 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.