Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Causal Analysis of Syntactic Agreement Neurons in Multilingual Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.14328 v1 pith:J65C6GIA submitted 2022-10-25 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelslanguagemultilingualsyntacticagreementfindacrossanalyses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Structural probing work has found evidence for latent syntactic information in pre-trained language models. However, much of this analysis has focused on monolingual models, and analyses of multilingual models have employed correlational methods that are confounded by the choice of probing tasks. In this study, we causally probe multilingual language models (XGLM and multilingual BERT) as well as monolingual BERT-based models across various languages; we do this by performing counterfactual perturbations on neuron activations and observing the effect on models' subject-verb agreement probabilities. We observe where in the model and to what extent syntactic agreement is encoded in each language. We find significant neuron overlap across languages in autoregressive multilingual language models, but not masked language models. We also find two distinct layer-wise effect patterns and two distinct sets of neurons used for syntactic agreement, depending on whether the subject and verb are separated by other tokens. Finally, we find that behavioral analyses of language models are likely underestimating how sensitive masked language models are to syntactic information.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Understanding and Mitigating Cross-lingual Privacy Leakage via Language-specific and Universal Privacy Neurons

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Cross-lingual privacy leakage in LLMs is driven by a mix of language-universal and language-specific neurons, and deactivating those neurons lowers measured leakage by 23.3% to 31.6%.

  2. How Syntax Specialization Emerges in Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Syntactic specialization in language models emerges gradually during training, concentrates in particular layers, and appears to stabilize after roughly 16 million tokens.

Pith tools