Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Stealthy Measurement-Aided Pole-Dynamics Attacks with Nominal Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.14403 v2 pith:WDNKUGNA submitted 2022-10-26 eess.SY cs.SY

Stealthy Measurement-Aided Pole-Dynamics Attacks with Nominal Models

classification eess.SY cs.SY
keywords modelstealthinessmapdasmismatchmodelsmethodtpdasattacks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

When traditional pole-dynamics attacks (TPDAs) are implemented with nominal models, model mismatch between exact and nominal models often affects their stealthiness, or even makes the stealthiness lost. To solve this problem, our current paper presents a novel stealthy measurement-aided pole-dynamics attacks (MAPDAs) method with model mismatch. Firstly, the limitations of TPDAs using exact models are revealed, where exact models help ensure the stealthiness of TPDAs but model mismatch severely influences its stealthiness. Secondly, to handle model mismatch, the proposed MAPDAs method is designed by using a model reference adaptive control strategy, which can keep the stealthiness. Moreover, it is easier to implement as only the measurements are needed in comparison with the existing methods requiring both the measurements and control inputs. Thirdly, the performance of the proposed MAPDAs method is explored using convergence of multivariate measurements, and MAPDAs with model mismatch have the same stealthiness and similar destructiveness as TPDAs. Specifically, MAPDAs with adaptive gains will remain stealthy at an acceptable detection threshold till destructiveness occurs. Finally, experimental results from a networked inverted pendulum system confirm the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.