Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Convergence analysis of a quasi-Monte Carlo-based deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.16196 v1 pith:TCDQLYHH submitted 2022-10-28 math.NA cs.LGcs.NA

classification math.NAcs.LGcs.NA
keywords errordeeplearningmethodsolvingalgorithmdifferentialequation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep learning methods have achieved great success in solving partial differential equations (PDEs), where the loss is often defined as an integral. The accuracy and efficiency of these algorithms depend greatly on the quadrature method. We propose to apply quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) methods to the Deep Ritz Method (DRM) for solving the Neumann problems for the Poisson equation and the static Schr\"{o}dinger equation. For error estimation, we decompose the error of using the deep learning algorithm to solve PDEs into the generalization error, the approximation error and the training error. We establish the upper bounds and prove that QMC-based DRM achieves an asymptotically smaller error bound than DRM. Numerical experiments show that the proposed method converges faster in all cases and the variances of the gradient estimators of randomized QMC-based DRM are much smaller than those of DRM, which illustrates the superiority of QMC in deep learning over MC.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A novel number-theoretic sampling method for neural network solutions of partial differential equations

    math.NA 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using good lattice points as training points for physics-informed neural networks gives lower errors on low-regularity and high-dimensional PDEs, with a quadrature error of O((log N)^d/N) versus O(N^{-1/2}) for random...

Pith tools