REVIEW 1 cited by
Testing Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter with ALMA Observations of the Gravitational Lens B1422+231
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We examine the flux density ratio anomaly in the quadruply-imaged strong gravitational lens, B1422+231, and consider the contribution of $10-10^3M_{\odot}$ primordial black holes (PBHs) as a potential dark matter constituent. We describe the first flux density ratio measurement of B1422+231 in the millimeter-wave band using the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA). This fills an important multi-wavelength gap in our knowledge of this key lensed system. The flux density of the quasar at 233 GHz is dominated by synchrotron emission and the source size is estimated to be 66.9 pc. The observed flux density ratios at 233 GHz are similar to those measured in radio, mid-infrared and optical bands, which cannot be explained by a simple smooth mass model of the lens galaxy. We examine the probability of the flux density ratio anomaly arising from PBH microlensing using ray tracing simulations. The simulations consider the cases where 10% and 50% of dark matter are $10-10^3M_{\odot}$ PBHs with a power law mass function. Our analysis shows that the anomalous flux density ratio for B1422+231 can be explained by a lens model with a significant fraction of dark matter being PBHs. This study demonstrates the potential for new constraints on PBH dark matter using ALMA observations of multiply imaged strong gravitational lenses.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Constraining compact dark matter with time-varying quasar equivalent widths
A search of archival quasar spectra claims 19 objects show microlensing by compact dark matter with masses 5e-5 to 2e-2 solar masses, but the evidence hinges on a selection-biased model comparison.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.