Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Empirical Evaluation of Post-Training Quantization Methods for Language Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.16621 v1 pith:5FBXEPAV submitted 2022-10-29 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords quantizationbertlanguagetasksbenchmarkevaluationgluemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Transformer-based architectures like BERT have achieved great success in a wide range of Natural Language tasks. Despite their decent performance, the models still have numerous parameters and high computational complexity, impeding their deployment in resource-constrained environments. Post-Training Quantization (PTQ), which enables low-bit computations without extra training, could be a promising tool. In this work, we conduct an empirical evaluation of three PTQ methods on BERT-Base and BERT-Large: Linear Quantization (LQ), Analytical Clipping for Integer Quantization (ACIQ), and Outlier Channel Splitting (OCS). OCS theoretically surpasses the others in minimizing the Mean Square quantization Error and avoiding distorting the weights' outliers. That is consistent with the evaluation results of most language tasks of GLUE benchmark and a reading comprehension task, SQuAD. Moreover, low-bit quantized BERT models could outperform the corresponding 32-bit baselines on several small language tasks, which we attribute to the alleviation of over-parameterization. We further explore the limit of quantization bit and show that OCS could quantize BERT-Base and BERT-Large to 3-bits and retain 98% and 96% of the performance on the GLUE benchmark accordingly. Moreover, we conduct quantization on the whole BERT family, i.e., BERT models in different configurations, and comprehensively evaluate their performance on the GLUE benchmark and SQuAD, hoping to provide valuable guidelines for their deployment in various computation environments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Post-Training Quantization of Generative and Discriminative LSTM Text Classifiers: A Study of Calibration, Class Balance, and Robustness

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Generative LSTM classifiers under post-training quantization are far more sensitive than discriminative ones to calibration data class balance and input noise, especially at 3- to 5-bit widths.

Pith tools