Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Simple, Yet Effective Approach to Finding Biases in Code Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.00609 v2 pith:I2TGOLSN submitted 2022-10-31 cs.AI cs.PL

classification cs.AIcs.PL
keywords codebiasesgenerationlanguagelargemodelssystemsunder
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, high-performing code generation systems based on large language models have surfaced. They are trained on massive corpora containing much more natural text than actual executable computer code. This work shows that current code generation systems exhibit undesired biases inherited from their large language model backbones, which can reduce the quality of the generated code under specific circumstances. To investigate the effect, we propose the "block of influence" concept, which enables a modular decomposition and analysis of the coding challenges. We introduce an automated intervention mechanism reminiscent of adversarial testing that exposes undesired biases through the failure modes of the models under test. Finally, we demonstrate how our framework can be used as a data transformation technique during fine-tuning, acting as a mitigation strategy for these biases.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How Reasoning Shapes Social Bias in LLM-Generated Code?

    cs.SE 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Reasoning before code generation lowers the average bias rate in LLM-generated code from 0.64 to 0.40, and a new probe-based method (ProbeDebias) cuts bias by about 84% while keeping quality nearly unchanged.

Pith tools