Sub-Nanosecond Electrical Pulse Switching of an Easy Plane Antiferromagnetic Insulator

Fengyuan Yang; Jose Flores; Justin J. Michel

arxiv: 2211.07589 · v2 · submitted 2022-11-14 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall

Sub-Nanosecond Electrical Pulse Switching of an Easy Plane Antiferromagnetic Insulator

Justin J. Michel , Jose Flores , Fengyuan Yang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 10:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph cond-mat.mes-hall

keywords antiferromagnetic switchingspin-orbit torquesub-nanosecond pulsesalpha-Fe2O3Pt bilayerNéel vectorelectrical control

0 comments

The pith

Electrical pulses as short as 0.3 ns switch the Néel vector in Pt/α-Fe₂O₃ antiferromagnetic bilayers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates reliable current-induced switching of antiferromagnetic order in Pt/α-Fe₂O₃ bilayers using pulses from microseconds down to 0.3 ns. Earlier work had shown such reorientation only in the quasi-DC regime. Temperature simulations are used to link the fastest pulses to thermally assisted spin-orbit torque. A reader would care because sub-nanosecond control is a prerequisite for practical antiferromagnetic spintronic circuits.

Core claim

Reliable current-induced AFM switching occurs in Pt/α-Fe₂O₃ bilayers for electrical pulses spanning three orders of magnitude down to 0.3 ns. COMSOL simulations of temperature distributions indicate that thermally-assisted spin-orbit torque likely plays an important role for sub-ns pulses.

What carries the argument

The Pt/α-Fe₂O₃ bilayer in which current pulses generate spin-orbit torque whose effectiveness at sub-nanosecond durations is assisted by Joule heating.

Load-bearing premise

COMSOL temperature simulations accurately capture the heating that enables switching for the shortest pulses.

What would settle it

Demonstration that 0.3 ns switching persists when sample heating is suppressed or when measured temperatures fall below the simulated threshold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2211.07589 by Fengyuan Yang, Jose Flores, Justin J. Michel.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: (a) Schematic of the switching circuit and device of a Pt(4 nm)/Fe2O3(15 nm) bilayer with a 1.5  1.5 µm2 cross area and 0.5 µm wide Hall leads (inset: SEM image). The Pt layer is etched into a Hall cross and 100-nm thick silver is deposited on the pad area. (b) Time profile of pulse voltages of various widths sent from a pulse generator with a 1 V output voltage and delivered to the device circuit as meas… view at source ↗

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 012345 Delivered Pulse Voltage (V) Pulse Time (ns) t = 0.3 ns 1 ns 5 ns (b) 0H = 0 T -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 0 90 180 270 360 Rxy ( m  ) In-plane field angle  (deg) 1 T 0.5 T 0.3 T 0.1 T Pt(4 nm)/Fe2O3(15 nm) (c) (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Electrical switching of antiferromagnets (AFM) is critical for AFM spintronics. However, electrical pulse-induced Neel vector reorientation in AFM insulators, while predicted to occur at much faster timescales than ferromagnetic switching, has only been demonstrated in the quasi-DC regime. Here we report reliable current-induced AFM switching in Pt/$\alpha$-Fe$_2$O$_3$ bilayers using electrical pulses with various durations spanning three orders of magnitude down to 0.3 ns. Together with COMSOL simulations of temperature distributions in our samples for various pulse widths, our results suggest that thermally-assisted spin-orbit torque likely play an important role for sub-ns pulses. This work demonstrates the viability of electrical switching of AFM spins using sub-ns pulses.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

They show sub-ns pulse switching in Pt/Fe2O3 down to 0.3 ns, new for AFM insulators, but the thermally-assisted SOT claim for the fastest regime rests on COMSOL without direct temperature checks.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this work demonstrates current-induced Néel vector switching in Pt/α-Fe₂O₃ bilayers using pulses from quasi-DC down to 0.3 ns. That extension across three orders of magnitude in pulse width is the concrete new result, and it matches the abstract claim of being the first such demonstration in an AFM insulator at these speeds. The experimental data on switching thresholds versus pulse duration is the part that stands on its own and could be useful for device-oriented readers thinking about speed limits in AFM spintronics. The COMSOL temperature simulations are used to attribute the sub-ns regime to thermally-assisted spin-orbit torque, with the modeled heating said to align with observed behavior. That interpretation is reasonable as a hypothesis but sits on thinner ground because there is no independent experimental temperature measurement at the shortest timescales. If the thermal model underestimates interface resistance or misses non-thermal contributions, the mechanism for the 0.3 ns case would need revisiting even if the raw switching observation holds. The paper is a straightforward experimental report with no self-referential fitting or invented parameters, and the citations track prior AFM switching literature without circularity. For people working on antiferromagnetic memory or spin-orbit torque devices, the pulse-width dependence data is worth seeing. It is coherent enough on its own terms to merit referee time rather than a desk reject, though any review should press on the temperature validation for the fastest pulses.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental demonstration of reliable current-induced Néel vector switching in Pt/α-Fe₂O₃ bilayers using electrical pulses spanning three orders of magnitude in duration, down to 0.3 ns. The authors interpret the sub-ns regime as dominated by thermally-assisted spin-orbit torque on the basis of COMSOL multiphysics simulations of Joule heating and temperature distributions that are said to match the observed switching thresholds.

Significance. If the central experimental observation of sub-ns switching holds, the work would be significant for antiferromagnetic spintronics by establishing that electrical control of AFM insulators is feasible at timescales relevant to high-speed applications, extending beyond the quasi-DC regime previously reported. The broad pulse-duration range supplies useful comparative data, though the mechanistic attribution remains interpretive.

major comments (2)

[COMSOL simulations and sub-ns mechanism discussion] The mechanistic claim that thermally-assisted SOT dominates for sub-ns pulses (abstract and the section presenting COMSOL results) rests on temperature distributions from COMSOL simulations matching observed thresholds. No direct experimental temperature data (time-resolved Raman, on-chip sensors, or equivalent) are reported for the 0.3–1 ns regime, so the simulation accuracy and exclusion of direct SOT, Oersted fields, or artifacts cannot be verified.
[Experimental results and figures showing switching data] The abstract states 'reliable' switching across the pulse range, yet the presented data lack reported error bars, switching-probability statistics, or full characterization of pulse waveforms and rise/fall times, which are required to substantiate the quantitative claim of reliability down to 0.3 ns.

minor comments (2)

[Figure captions] Figure captions should explicitly list the Pt and α-Fe₂O₃ layer thicknesses, pulse amplitudes, and exact durations used in each panel.
[Methods and results] Notation for the in-plane Néel vector orientation (e.g., relative to current direction) could be defined once in the main text and used consistently.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below with point-by-point responses. Where revisions are feasible without misrepresenting the work, we have incorporated changes; we also note genuine limitations in the current study.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [COMSOL simulations and sub-ns mechanism discussion] The mechanistic claim that thermally-assisted SOT dominates for sub-ns pulses (abstract and the section presenting COMSOL results) rests on temperature distributions from COMSOL simulations matching observed thresholds. No direct experimental temperature data (time-resolved Raman, on-chip sensors, or equivalent) are reported for the 0.3–1 ns regime, so the simulation accuracy and exclusion of direct SOT, Oersted fields, or artifacts cannot be verified.

Authors: We agree that the absence of direct experimental temperature measurements in the sub-ns regime limits the ability to independently verify the COMSOL temperature distributions and fully exclude alternative mechanisms such as direct SOT or Oersted-field effects. Our interpretation relies on the simulations reproducing the observed switching thresholds using established material parameters and Joule-heating models. In the revised manuscript we have modified the abstract and discussion sections to present thermally-assisted SOT as a plausible mechanism suggested by the simulations rather than a definitively established one, and we have added a paragraph discussing the challenges of sub-ns thermometry and possible contributions from other effects. revision: partial
Referee: [Experimental results and figures showing switching data] The abstract states 'reliable' switching across the pulse range, yet the presented data lack reported error bars, switching-probability statistics, or full characterization of pulse waveforms and rise/fall times, which are required to substantiate the quantitative claim of reliability down to 0.3 ns.

Authors: We acknowledge that the original figures and text did not include error bars, explicit switching-probability statistics from repeated trials, or detailed pulse-waveform characterization. In the revised manuscript we have updated the relevant figures to display error bars derived from multiple device measurements, added a supplementary section with switching-probability histograms and statistics, and included oscilloscope traces of the applied pulses with measured rise and fall times. These additions directly support the claim of reliable switching down to 0.3 ns. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved

Direct experimental temperature data (e.g., time-resolved Raman or on-chip sensors) for the 0.3–1 ns pulse regime is not available in the present work and cannot be supplied without new experiments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Experimental report with direct observations and external modeling; no circular derivations or self-referential predictions

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental observations of current-induced AFM switching in Pt/α-Fe₂O₃ bilayers using pulses down to 0.3 ns, with COMSOL temperature simulations used only to interpret mechanism. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-citations, or ansatzes appear in the provided text. The central claims rest on measured switching behavior benchmarked against pulse durations, not on any derivation that reduces to its own inputs by construction. The simulation step is an external modeling choice whose validity can be assessed independently and does not create circularity in the reported results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental demonstration paper; no mathematical free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5657 in / 1022 out tokens · 41659 ms · 2026-05-24T10:33:37.284642+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The dependence of switching threshold current density on the pulse width indicates that spin-orbit torques are the dominant mechanism... J_th = J_th0 + Q/Δt... COMSOL simulations... maximum temperature rise of 0.17 to 3.6 K
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

reliable current-induced AFM switching... down to 0.3 ns

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

[1]

Spin transport and spin torque in antiferromagnetic devices,

J. Železný, P. Wadley, K. Olejník, A. Hoffm ann and H. Ohno, "Spin transport and spin torque in antiferromagnetic devices," Nat. Phys. 14, 220-228 (2018)

work page 2018
[2]

Antiferromagnetic spintronics,

V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono and Y. Tserkovnyak, "Antiferromagnetic spintronics," Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015005 (2018)

work page 2018
[3]

Antiferromagnetic spintronics,

T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley and J. Wunderlich, "Antiferromagnetic spintronics," Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 231 (2016)

work page 2016
[4]

Spin Pumping and Spin-Transfer Torques in Antiferromagnets,

R. Cheng, J. Xiao, Q. Niu and A. Brataas, "Spin Pumping and Spin-Transfer Torques in Antiferromagnets," Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 057601 (2014)

work page 2014
[5]

Writing and reading of an arbitrary optical polarization state in an antiferromagnet,

T. Satoh, R. Iida, T. Higuchi, M. Fiebig and T. Shimura, "Writing and reading of an arbitrary optical polarization state in an antiferromagnet," Nat. Photonics 9, 25 (2015)

work page 2015
[6]

Electrical switching of an antiferromagnet,

P. Wadley, B. Howells, J. Zelezny, C. Andrew s, V. Hills, R. P. Campion, V. Novak, K. Olejnik, F. Maccherozzi, S. S. Dhesi, S. Y. Martin, T. Wagner, J. Wunderlich, F. Freimuth, Y. Mokrousov, J. Kunes, J. S. Chauhan, M. J. Grzybowski, A. W. Rushforth, K. W. Edmonds, B. L. Gallagher and T. Jungwirth, "Electrical switching of an antiferromagnet," Science 351...

work page 2016
[7]

Electrical Switching of Antiferromagnetic Mn 2Au and the Role of Thermal Activation,

M. Meinert, D. Graulich and T. Ma talla-Wagner, "Electrical Switching of Antiferromagnetic Mn 2Au and the Role of Thermal Activation," Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 064040 (2018)

work page 2018
[8]

Strong Orientation-Dependent Spin-Orbit Torque in Thin Films of the Antiferromagnet Mn2Au,

X. F. Zhou, J. Zhang, F. Li, X. Z. Chen, G. Y. Shi, Y. Z. Tan, Y. D. Gu, M. S. Saleem, H. Q. Wu, F. Pan and C. Song, "Strong Orientation-Dependent Spin-Orbit Torque in Thin Films of the Antiferromagnet Mn2Au," Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 054028 (2018)

work page 2018
[9]

Writing and reading antiferromagnetic Mn2Au by Néel spin-orbit torques and large anisotropic magnetoresistance,

S. Y. Bodnar, L. Šmejkal, I. Turek, T. J ungwirth, O. Gomonay, J. Sinova, A. A. Sapozhnik, H. J. Elmers, M. Kläui and M. Jourdan, "Writing and reading antiferromagnetic Mn2Au by Néel spin-orbit torques and large anisotropic magnetoresistance," Nat. Commun. 9, 348 (2018)

work page 2018
[10]

Imaging Current-Induced Switching of Antiferromagnetic Domains in CuMnAs,

M. J. Grzybowski, P. Wadley, K. W. Edmonds, R. Beardsley, V. Hills, R. P. Campion, B. L. Gallagher, J. S. Chauhan, V. Novak, T. Jungwirth, F. Maccherozzi and S. S. Dhesi, "Imaging Current-Induced Switching of Antiferromagnetic Domains in CuMnAs," Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 057701 (2017)

work page 2017
[11]

Antidamping-Torque-Induced Switching in Biaxial Antiferromagnetic Insulators,

X. Z. Chen, R. Zarzuela, J. Zhang, C. Song, X. F. Zhou, G. Y. Shi, F. Li, H. A. Zhou, W. J. Jiang, F. Pan and Y. Tserkovnyak, "Antidamping-Torque-Induced Switching in Biaxial Antiferromagnetic Insulators," Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 207204 (2018)

work page 2018
[12]

Spin torque control of antiferromagnetic moments in NiO,

T. Moriyama, K. Oda, T. Ohkochi, M. K imata and T. Ono, "Spin torque control of antiferromagnetic moments in NiO," Sci Rep 8, 14167 (2018)

work page 2018
[13]

Mechanism of Neel Order Switching in Antiferromagnetic Thin Films Revealed by Magnetotransport and Direct Imaging,

L. Baldrati, O. Gomonay, A. Ross, M. Filia nina, R. Lebrun, R. Ramos, C. Leveille, F. Fuhrmann, T. R. Forrest, F. Maccherozzi, S. Valencia, F. Kronast, E. Saitoh, J. Sinova and M. Kläui, "Mechanism of Neel Order Switching in Antiferromagnetic Thin Films Revealed by Magnetotransport and Direct Imaging," Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 177201 (2019)

work page 2019
[14]

Direct Imaging of Current-Induced Antiferromagnetic Switching Revealing a Pure Thermomagnetoelastic Switching Mechanism in NiO,

H. Meer, F. Schreiber, C. Schmitt, R. Ramos, E. Saitoh, O. Gomonay, J. Sinova, L. Baldrati and M. Kläui, "Direct Imaging of Current-Induced Antiferromagnetic Switching Revealing a Pure Thermomagnetoelastic Switching Mechanism in NiO," Nano Letters 21, 114-119 (2021)

work page 2021
[15]

Electrical Switching of Tristate Antiferromagnetic Néel Order in a-Fe 2O3 Epitaxial Films,

Y. Cheng, S. S. Yu, M. L. Zhu, J. Hwang a nd F. Y. Yang, "Electrical Switching of Tristate Antiferromagnetic Néel Order in a-Fe 2O3 Epitaxial Films," Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 027202 (2020). 11

work page 2020
[16]

Quantitative Study on Current-Induced Effect in an Antiferromagnet Insulator/Pt Bilayer Film,

P. X. Zhang, J. Finley, T. Safi and L. Q. Liu, "Quantitative Study on Current-Induced Effect in an Antiferromagnet Insulator/Pt Bilayer Film," Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 247206 (2019)

work page 2019
[17]

Spin Seebeck Imaging of Spin-Torque Switching in Antiferromagnetic Pt/NiO Heterostructures,

I. Gray, T. Moriyama, N. Sivadas, G. M. Stie hl, J. T. Heron, R. Need, B. J. Kirby, D. H. Low, K. C. Nowack, D. G. Schlom, D. C. Ralph, T. Ono and G. D. Fuchs, "Spin Seebeck Imaging of Spin-Torque Switching in Antiferromagnetic Pt/NiO Heterostructures," Phys. Rev. X 9, 041016 (2019)

work page 2019
[18]

Quantifying Spin-Orbit Torques in Antiferromagnet--Heavy-Metal Heterostructures,

E. Cogulu, H. T. Zhang, N. N. Statuto, Y. Cheng, F. Y. Yang, R. Cheng and A. D. Kent, "Quantifying Spin-Orbit Torques in Antiferromagnet--Heavy-Metal Heterostructures," Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 247204 (2022)

work page 2022
[19]

Third harmonic characterization of antiferromagnetic heterostructures,

Y. Cheng, E. Cogulu, R. D. Resnick, J. J. Mi chel, N. N. Statuto, A. D. Kent and F. Y. Yang, "Third harmonic characterization of antiferromagnetic heterostructures," Nat. Commun. 13, 3659 (2022)

work page 2022
[20]

Systematic study of nonmagnetic resistance changes due to electrical pulsing in single metal layers and metal/antiferromagnet bilayers,

B. J. Jacot, G. Krishnaswamy, G. Sala, C. O. Avci, S. Vélez, P. Gambardella and C. H. Lambert, "Systematic study of nonmagnetic resistance changes due to electrical pulsing in single metal layers and metal/antiferromagnet bilayers," J. Appl. Phys. 128, 173902 (2020)

work page 2020
[21]

Absence of Evidence of Electrical Switching of the Antiferromagnetic Neel Vector,

C. C. Chiang, S. Y. Huang, D. Qu, P. H. Wu and C. L. Chien, "Absence of Evidence of Electrical Switching of the Antiferromagnetic Neel Vector," Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 227203 (2019)

work page 2019
[22]

Non-magnetic origin of spin Hall magnetoresistance- like signals in Pt films and epitaxial NiO/Pt bilayers,

A. Churikova, D. Bono, B. Neltner, A. Witt mann, L. Scipioni, A. Shepard, T. Newhouse- Illige, J. Greer and G. S. D. Beach, "Non-magnetic origin of spin Hall magnetoresistance- like signals in Pt films and epitaxial NiO/Pt bilayers," Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 022410 (2020)

work page 2020
[23]

Anisotropic magnetoresistance and nontrivial spin Hall magnetoresistance in Pt/a- Fe2O3 bilayers,

Y. Cheng, S. S. Yu, A. S. Ahmed, M. L. Z hu, Y. Rao, M. Ghazisaeidi, J. Hwang and F. Y. Yang, "Anisotropic magnetoresistance and nontrivial spin Hall magnetoresistance in Pt/a- Fe2O3 bilayers," Phys. Rev. B 100, 220408 (2019)

work page 2019
[24]

Direct imaging of electrical switching of antiferromagnetic Neel order in a-Fe2O3 epitaxial films,

E. Cogulu, N. N. Statuto, Y. Cheng, F. Y. Ya ng, R. V. Chopdekar, H. Ohldag and A. D. Kent, "Direct imaging of electrical switching of antiferromagnetic Neel order in a-Fe2O3 epitaxial films," Phys. Rev. B 103, L100405 (2021)

work page 2021
[25]

Ultrafast magnetization switching by spin-orbit torques,

K. Garello, C. O. Avci, I. M. Miron, M. Ba umgartner, A. Ghosh, S. Auffret, O. Boulle, G. Gaudin and P. Gambardella, "Ultrafast magnetization switching by spin-orbit torques," Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 212402 (2014)

work page 2014
[26]

Ultrafast switching in magnetic tunnel junction based orthogonal spin transfer devices,

H. Liu, D. Bedau, D. Backes, J. A. Katine, J. Langer and A. D. Kent, "Ultrafast switching in magnetic tunnel junction based orthogonal spin transfer devices," Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 242510 (2010)

work page 2010
[27]

Nanosecond ultralow power spin orbit torque magnetization switching driven by BiSb topological insulator,

N. H. D. Khang, T. Shirokura, T. Fan, M. Ta kahashi, N. Nakatani, D. Kato, Y. Miyamoto and P. N. Hai, "Nanosecond ultralow power spin orbit torque magnetization switching driven by BiSb topological insulator," Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 152401 (2022)

work page 2022
[28]

Spin- transfer pulse switching: From the dynamic to the thermally activated regime,

D. Bedau, H. Liu, J. Z. Sun, J. A. Katine, E. E. Fullerton, S. Mangin and A. D. Kent, "Spin- transfer pulse switching: From the dynamic to the thermally activated regime," Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 262502 (2010). 12 Figure 1. 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 012345 Delivered Pulse Voltage (V) Pulse Time (ns) t = 0.3 ns 1 ns 5 ns (b) 0H = 0 T -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 0 90 ...

work page 2010

[1] [1]

Spin transport and spin torque in antiferromagnetic devices,

J. Železný, P. Wadley, K. Olejník, A. Hoffm ann and H. Ohno, "Spin transport and spin torque in antiferromagnetic devices," Nat. Phys. 14, 220-228 (2018)

work page 2018

[2] [2]

Antiferromagnetic spintronics,

V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono and Y. Tserkovnyak, "Antiferromagnetic spintronics," Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015005 (2018)

work page 2018

[3] [3]

Antiferromagnetic spintronics,

T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley and J. Wunderlich, "Antiferromagnetic spintronics," Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 231 (2016)

work page 2016

[4] [4]

Spin Pumping and Spin-Transfer Torques in Antiferromagnets,

R. Cheng, J. Xiao, Q. Niu and A. Brataas, "Spin Pumping and Spin-Transfer Torques in Antiferromagnets," Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 057601 (2014)

work page 2014

[5] [5]

Writing and reading of an arbitrary optical polarization state in an antiferromagnet,

T. Satoh, R. Iida, T. Higuchi, M. Fiebig and T. Shimura, "Writing and reading of an arbitrary optical polarization state in an antiferromagnet," Nat. Photonics 9, 25 (2015)

work page 2015

[6] [6]

Electrical switching of an antiferromagnet,

P. Wadley, B. Howells, J. Zelezny, C. Andrew s, V. Hills, R. P. Campion, V. Novak, K. Olejnik, F. Maccherozzi, S. S. Dhesi, S. Y. Martin, T. Wagner, J. Wunderlich, F. Freimuth, Y. Mokrousov, J. Kunes, J. S. Chauhan, M. J. Grzybowski, A. W. Rushforth, K. W. Edmonds, B. L. Gallagher and T. Jungwirth, "Electrical switching of an antiferromagnet," Science 351...

work page 2016

[7] [7]

Electrical Switching of Antiferromagnetic Mn 2Au and the Role of Thermal Activation,

M. Meinert, D. Graulich and T. Ma talla-Wagner, "Electrical Switching of Antiferromagnetic Mn 2Au and the Role of Thermal Activation," Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 064040 (2018)

work page 2018

[8] [8]

Strong Orientation-Dependent Spin-Orbit Torque in Thin Films of the Antiferromagnet Mn2Au,

X. F. Zhou, J. Zhang, F. Li, X. Z. Chen, G. Y. Shi, Y. Z. Tan, Y. D. Gu, M. S. Saleem, H. Q. Wu, F. Pan and C. Song, "Strong Orientation-Dependent Spin-Orbit Torque in Thin Films of the Antiferromagnet Mn2Au," Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 054028 (2018)

work page 2018

[9] [9]

Writing and reading antiferromagnetic Mn2Au by Néel spin-orbit torques and large anisotropic magnetoresistance,

S. Y. Bodnar, L. Šmejkal, I. Turek, T. J ungwirth, O. Gomonay, J. Sinova, A. A. Sapozhnik, H. J. Elmers, M. Kläui and M. Jourdan, "Writing and reading antiferromagnetic Mn2Au by Néel spin-orbit torques and large anisotropic magnetoresistance," Nat. Commun. 9, 348 (2018)

work page 2018

[10] [10]

Imaging Current-Induced Switching of Antiferromagnetic Domains in CuMnAs,

M. J. Grzybowski, P. Wadley, K. W. Edmonds, R. Beardsley, V. Hills, R. P. Campion, B. L. Gallagher, J. S. Chauhan, V. Novak, T. Jungwirth, F. Maccherozzi and S. S. Dhesi, "Imaging Current-Induced Switching of Antiferromagnetic Domains in CuMnAs," Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 057701 (2017)

work page 2017

[11] [11]

Antidamping-Torque-Induced Switching in Biaxial Antiferromagnetic Insulators,

X. Z. Chen, R. Zarzuela, J. Zhang, C. Song, X. F. Zhou, G. Y. Shi, F. Li, H. A. Zhou, W. J. Jiang, F. Pan and Y. Tserkovnyak, "Antidamping-Torque-Induced Switching in Biaxial Antiferromagnetic Insulators," Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 207204 (2018)

work page 2018

[12] [12]

Spin torque control of antiferromagnetic moments in NiO,

T. Moriyama, K. Oda, T. Ohkochi, M. K imata and T. Ono, "Spin torque control of antiferromagnetic moments in NiO," Sci Rep 8, 14167 (2018)

work page 2018

[13] [13]

Mechanism of Neel Order Switching in Antiferromagnetic Thin Films Revealed by Magnetotransport and Direct Imaging,

L. Baldrati, O. Gomonay, A. Ross, M. Filia nina, R. Lebrun, R. Ramos, C. Leveille, F. Fuhrmann, T. R. Forrest, F. Maccherozzi, S. Valencia, F. Kronast, E. Saitoh, J. Sinova and M. Kläui, "Mechanism of Neel Order Switching in Antiferromagnetic Thin Films Revealed by Magnetotransport and Direct Imaging," Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 177201 (2019)

work page 2019

[14] [14]

Direct Imaging of Current-Induced Antiferromagnetic Switching Revealing a Pure Thermomagnetoelastic Switching Mechanism in NiO,

H. Meer, F. Schreiber, C. Schmitt, R. Ramos, E. Saitoh, O. Gomonay, J. Sinova, L. Baldrati and M. Kläui, "Direct Imaging of Current-Induced Antiferromagnetic Switching Revealing a Pure Thermomagnetoelastic Switching Mechanism in NiO," Nano Letters 21, 114-119 (2021)

work page 2021

[15] [15]

Electrical Switching of Tristate Antiferromagnetic Néel Order in a-Fe 2O3 Epitaxial Films,

Y. Cheng, S. S. Yu, M. L. Zhu, J. Hwang a nd F. Y. Yang, "Electrical Switching of Tristate Antiferromagnetic Néel Order in a-Fe 2O3 Epitaxial Films," Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 027202 (2020). 11

work page 2020

[16] [16]

Quantitative Study on Current-Induced Effect in an Antiferromagnet Insulator/Pt Bilayer Film,

P. X. Zhang, J. Finley, T. Safi and L. Q. Liu, "Quantitative Study on Current-Induced Effect in an Antiferromagnet Insulator/Pt Bilayer Film," Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 247206 (2019)

work page 2019

[17] [17]

Spin Seebeck Imaging of Spin-Torque Switching in Antiferromagnetic Pt/NiO Heterostructures,

I. Gray, T. Moriyama, N. Sivadas, G. M. Stie hl, J. T. Heron, R. Need, B. J. Kirby, D. H. Low, K. C. Nowack, D. G. Schlom, D. C. Ralph, T. Ono and G. D. Fuchs, "Spin Seebeck Imaging of Spin-Torque Switching in Antiferromagnetic Pt/NiO Heterostructures," Phys. Rev. X 9, 041016 (2019)

work page 2019

[18] [18]

Quantifying Spin-Orbit Torques in Antiferromagnet--Heavy-Metal Heterostructures,

E. Cogulu, H. T. Zhang, N. N. Statuto, Y. Cheng, F. Y. Yang, R. Cheng and A. D. Kent, "Quantifying Spin-Orbit Torques in Antiferromagnet--Heavy-Metal Heterostructures," Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 247204 (2022)

work page 2022

[19] [19]

Third harmonic characterization of antiferromagnetic heterostructures,

Y. Cheng, E. Cogulu, R. D. Resnick, J. J. Mi chel, N. N. Statuto, A. D. Kent and F. Y. Yang, "Third harmonic characterization of antiferromagnetic heterostructures," Nat. Commun. 13, 3659 (2022)

work page 2022

[20] [20]

Systematic study of nonmagnetic resistance changes due to electrical pulsing in single metal layers and metal/antiferromagnet bilayers,

B. J. Jacot, G. Krishnaswamy, G. Sala, C. O. Avci, S. Vélez, P. Gambardella and C. H. Lambert, "Systematic study of nonmagnetic resistance changes due to electrical pulsing in single metal layers and metal/antiferromagnet bilayers," J. Appl. Phys. 128, 173902 (2020)

work page 2020

[21] [21]

Absence of Evidence of Electrical Switching of the Antiferromagnetic Neel Vector,

C. C. Chiang, S. Y. Huang, D. Qu, P. H. Wu and C. L. Chien, "Absence of Evidence of Electrical Switching of the Antiferromagnetic Neel Vector," Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 227203 (2019)

work page 2019

[22] [22]

Non-magnetic origin of spin Hall magnetoresistance- like signals in Pt films and epitaxial NiO/Pt bilayers,

A. Churikova, D. Bono, B. Neltner, A. Witt mann, L. Scipioni, A. Shepard, T. Newhouse- Illige, J. Greer and G. S. D. Beach, "Non-magnetic origin of spin Hall magnetoresistance- like signals in Pt films and epitaxial NiO/Pt bilayers," Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 022410 (2020)

work page 2020

[23] [23]

Anisotropic magnetoresistance and nontrivial spin Hall magnetoresistance in Pt/a- Fe2O3 bilayers,

Y. Cheng, S. S. Yu, A. S. Ahmed, M. L. Z hu, Y. Rao, M. Ghazisaeidi, J. Hwang and F. Y. Yang, "Anisotropic magnetoresistance and nontrivial spin Hall magnetoresistance in Pt/a- Fe2O3 bilayers," Phys. Rev. B 100, 220408 (2019)

work page 2019

[24] [24]

Direct imaging of electrical switching of antiferromagnetic Neel order in a-Fe2O3 epitaxial films,

E. Cogulu, N. N. Statuto, Y. Cheng, F. Y. Ya ng, R. V. Chopdekar, H. Ohldag and A. D. Kent, "Direct imaging of electrical switching of antiferromagnetic Neel order in a-Fe2O3 epitaxial films," Phys. Rev. B 103, L100405 (2021)

work page 2021

[25] [25]

Ultrafast magnetization switching by spin-orbit torques,

K. Garello, C. O. Avci, I. M. Miron, M. Ba umgartner, A. Ghosh, S. Auffret, O. Boulle, G. Gaudin and P. Gambardella, "Ultrafast magnetization switching by spin-orbit torques," Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 212402 (2014)

work page 2014

[26] [26]

Ultrafast switching in magnetic tunnel junction based orthogonal spin transfer devices,

H. Liu, D. Bedau, D. Backes, J. A. Katine, J. Langer and A. D. Kent, "Ultrafast switching in magnetic tunnel junction based orthogonal spin transfer devices," Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 242510 (2010)

work page 2010

[27] [27]

Nanosecond ultralow power spin orbit torque magnetization switching driven by BiSb topological insulator,

N. H. D. Khang, T. Shirokura, T. Fan, M. Ta kahashi, N. Nakatani, D. Kato, Y. Miyamoto and P. N. Hai, "Nanosecond ultralow power spin orbit torque magnetization switching driven by BiSb topological insulator," Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 152401 (2022)

work page 2022

[28] [28]

Spin- transfer pulse switching: From the dynamic to the thermally activated regime,

D. Bedau, H. Liu, J. Z. Sun, J. A. Katine, E. E. Fullerton, S. Mangin and A. D. Kent, "Spin- transfer pulse switching: From the dynamic to the thermally activated regime," Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 262502 (2010). 12 Figure 1. 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 012345 Delivered Pulse Voltage (V) Pulse Time (ns) t = 0.3 ns 1 ns 5 ns (b) 0H = 0 T -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 0 90 ...

work page 2010