Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

UGIF: UI Grounded Instruction Following

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.07615 v2 pith:73Q4LGIB submitted 2022-11-14 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords englishinstructionstepstaskuserlanguagelanguagescommon
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Smartphone users often find it difficult to navigate myriad menus to perform common tasks such as "How to block calls from unknown numbers?". Currently, help documents with step-by-step instructions are manually written to aid the user. The user experience can be further enhanced by grounding the instructions in the help document to the UI and overlaying a tutorial on the phone UI. To build such tutorials, several natural language processing components including retrieval, parsing, and grounding are necessary, but there isn't any relevant dataset for such a task. Thus, we introduce UGIF-DataSet, a multi-lingual, multi-modal UI grounded dataset for step-by-step task completion on the smartphone containing 4,184 tasks across 8 languages. As an initial approach to this problem, we propose retrieving the relevant instruction steps based on the user's query and parsing the steps using Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate macros that can be executed on-device. The instruction steps are often available only in English, so the challenge includes cross-modal, cross-lingual retrieval of English how-to pages from user queries in many languages and mapping English instruction steps to UI in a potentially different language. We compare the performance of different LLMs including PaLM and GPT-3 and find that the end-to-end task completion rate is 48% for English UI but the performance drops to 32% for other languages. We analyze the common failure modes of existing models on this task and point out areas for improvement.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments

    cs.AI 2024-04 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    OSWorld provides the first unified real-computer benchmark for open-ended multimodal agent tasks, exposing large performance gaps between humans and state-of-the-art LLM/VLM agents.

  2. AndroidWorld: A Dynamic Benchmarking Environment for Autonomous Agents

    cs.AI 2024-05 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    AndroidWorld is a dynamic, reproducible Android benchmark that generates unlimited natural-language tasks for autonomous agents and shows current agents succeed on only 30.6 percent of them.

  3. Do LLMs Need to See Everything? A Benchmark and Study of Failures in LLM-driven Smartphone Automation using Screentext vs. Screenshots

    cs.HC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark shows LLM smartphone agents achieve comparable success with screen text alone as with screenshots, but both fail often due to UI accessibility and reasoning gaps.

  4. Mobile GUI Agents under Real-world Threats: Are We There Yet?

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Introduces an app-content instrumentation framework and benchmark showing that examined GUI agents suffer 42.0% and 36.1% average misleading rates from third-party content in dynamic and static tests respectively.

  5. A Comprehensive Survey of Agents for Computer Use: Foundations, Challenges, and Future Directions

    cs.AI 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey of 87 agents for computer use and 33 datasets that introduces a three-dimensional taxonomy across domain, interaction, and agent perspectives and identifies six research gaps.

Pith tools