Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Deepfake Detection: A Comprehensive Survey from the Reliability Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.10881 v4 pith:OQM2XLIG submitted 2022-11-20 cs.CV cs.MM

classification cs.CVcs.MM
keywords deepfakedetectionreliabilityexistingsurveybeencaseschallenges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The mushroomed Deepfake synthetic materials circulated on the internet have raised a profound social impact on politicians, celebrities, and individuals worldwide. In this survey, we provide a thorough review of the existing Deepfake detection studies from the reliability perspective. We identify three reliability-oriented research challenges in the current Deepfake detection domain: transferability, interpretability, and robustness. Moreover, while solutions have been frequently addressed regarding the three challenges, the general reliability of a detection model has been barely considered, leading to the lack of reliable evidence in real-life usages and even for prosecutions on Deepfake-related cases in court. We, therefore, introduce a model reliability study metric using statistical random sampling knowledge and the publicly available benchmark datasets to review the reliability of the existing detection models on arbitrary Deepfake candidate suspects. Case studies are further executed to justify the real-life Deepfake cases including different groups of victims with the help of the reliably qualified detection models as reviewed in this survey. Reviews and experiments on the existing approaches provide informative discussions and future research directions for Deepfake detection.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LampMark: Proactive Deepfake Detection via Training-Free Landmark Perceptual Watermarks

    cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    LampMark embeds a landmark-derived watermark into face images and detects deepfakes by comparing the recovered watermark to the current landmarks, achieving AUCs above 98% across seven manipulations.

  2. RealSeal: Revolutionizing Media Authentication with Real-Time Realism Scoring

    cs.CR 2024-11 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    RealSeal proposes embedding a cryptographically signed realism score, computed from multisensory inputs, into the metadata of genuine images instead of watermarking synthetic media.

Pith tools