REVIEW 2 cited by
Mitigating Data Sparsity for Short Text Topic Modeling by Topic-Semantic Contrastive Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
To overcome the data sparsity issue in short text topic modeling, existing methods commonly rely on data augmentation or the data characteristic of short texts to introduce more word co-occurrence information. However, most of them do not make full use of the augmented data or the data characteristic: they insufficiently learn the relations among samples in data, leading to dissimilar topic distributions of semantically similar text pairs. To better address data sparsity, in this paper we propose a novel short text topic modeling framework, Topic-Semantic Contrastive Topic Model (TSCTM). To sufficiently model the relations among samples, we employ a new contrastive learning method with efficient positive and negative sampling strategies based on topic semantics. This contrastive learning method refines the representations, enriches the learning signals, and thus mitigates the sparsity issue. Extensive experimental results show that our TSCTM outperforms state-of-the-art baselines regardless of the data augmentation availability, producing high-quality topics and topic distributions.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Enhancing Topic Interpretability for Neural Topic Modeling through Topic-wise Contrastive Learning
A topic-wise contrastive regularizer using precomputed NPMI similarities improves coherence and diversity of neural topic model topics on 20NG, Yahoo, and NYTimes.
-
Aspect-Based Summarization with Self-Aspect Retrieval Enhanced Generation
SARESG prunes documents to aspect-relevant sentences via embedding similarity before LLM summarization, reporting gains over selective-context baselines on three datasets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.