Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The critical role of nuclear heating rates, thermalization efficiencies and opacities for kilonova modelling and parameter inference

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.14348 v3 pith:MRUZ6FKD submitted 2022-11-25 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR

The critical role of nuclear heating rates, thermalization efficiencies and opacities for kilonova modelling and parameter inference

classification astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR
keywords textttejectaheatingkilonovaopacitiesratesthermalizationassumptions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present an improved version of the 3D Monte Carlo radiative transfer code POSSIS to model kilonovae from neutron star mergers, wherein nuclear heating rates, thermalization efficiencies and wavelength-dependent opacities depend on local properties of the ejecta and time. Using an axially-symmetric two-component ejecta model, we explore how simplistic assumptions on heating rates, thermalization efficiencies and opacities often found in the literature affect kilonova spectra and light curves. Specifically, we compute five models: one ($\texttt{FIDUCIAL}$) with an appropriate treatment of these three quantities, one ($\texttt{SIMPLE-HEAT}$) with uniform heating rates throughout the ejecta, one ($\texttt{SIMPLE-THERM}$) with a constant and uniform thermalization efficiency, one ($\texttt{SIMPLE-OPAC}$) with grey opacities and one ($\texttt{SIMPLE-ALL}$) with all these three simplistic assumptions combined. We find that deviations from the $\texttt{FIDUCIAL}$ model are of several ($\sim1-10$) magnitudes and are generally larger for the $\texttt{SIMPLE-OPAC}$ and $\texttt{SIMPLE-ALL}$ compared to the $\texttt{SIMPLE-THERM}$ and $\texttt{SIMPLE-HEAT}$ models. The discrepancies generally increase from a face-on to an edge-on view of the system, from early to late epochs and from infrared to ultraviolet/optical wavelengths. Our work indicates that kilonova studies using either of these simplistic assumptions ought to be treated with caution and that appropriate systematic uncertainties ought to be added to kilonova light curves when performing inference on ejecta parameters.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Late-time emission-line profiles from kilonova models

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Late-time optically-thin kilonova line profiles computed from 2D long-term merger ejecta are complex, orientation-dependent and broadened by r-process heating, encoding ejecta structure.

  2. nmma: An extended Bayesian framework for Nuclear Multimessenger Astronomy in the Era of Next-Generation Detectors

    astro-ph.IM 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    nmma now jointly samples nuclear EoS parameters with GW and EM data via TOV emulators and Fiesta surrogates, delivering 20–60× speedups and future H0–nuclear constraints.