REVIEW 2 cited by
Contrastive Novelty-Augmented Learning: Anticipating Outliers with Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In many task settings, text classification models are likely to encounter examples from novel classes on which they cannot predict correctly. Selective prediction, in which models abstain on low-confidence examples, provides a possible solution, but existing models are often overly confident on unseen classes. To remedy this overconfidence, we introduce Contrastive Novelty-Augmented Learning (CoNAL), a two-step method that generates OOD examples representative of novel classes, then trains to decrease confidence on them. First, we generate OOD examples by prompting a large language model twice: we prompt it to enumerate relevant novel classes, then generate examples from each novel class matching the task format. Second, we train a classifier with a novel contrastive objective that encourages lower confidence on generated OOD examples than training examples. When trained with CoNAL, classifiers improve in their ability to detect and abstain on novel class examples over prior methods by an average of 2.3% in terms of accuracy under the accuracy-coverage curve (AUAC) and 5.5% AUROC across 4 NLP datasets, with no cost to in-distribution accuracy.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Graph Structure Refinement with Energy-based Contrastive Learning
A new framework, ECL-GSR, uses energy-based contrastive learning to refine noisy graph structure and reports state-of-the-art node classification accuracy on eight benchmarks.
-
A Review of Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Past, Present and Future
A historical review that organizes multimodal explainability methods into four chronological eras and three explainability types, extending coverage to generative LLMs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.