REVIEW 1 cited by
RADAR: A TTP-based Extensible, Explainable, and Effective System for Network Traffic Analysis and Malware Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Network analysis and machine learning techniques have been widely applied for building malware detection systems. Though these systems attain impressive results, they often are $(i)$ not extensible, being monolithic, well tuned for the specific task they have been designed for but very difficult to adapt and/or extend to other settings, and $(ii)$ not interpretable, being black boxes whose inner complexity makes it impossible to link the result of detection with its root cause, making further analysis of threats a challenge. In this paper we present RADAR, an extensible and explainable system that exploits the popular TTP (Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures) ontology of adversary behaviour described in the industry-standard MITRE ATT\&CK framework in order to unequivocally identify and classify malicious behaviour using network traffic. We evaluate RADAR on a very large dataset comprising of 2,286,907 malicious and benign samples, representing a total of 84,792,452 network flows. The experimental analysis confirms that the proposed methodology can be effectively exploited: RADAR's ability to detect malware is comparable to other state-of-the-art non-interpretable systems' capabilities. To the best of our knowledge, RADAR is the first TTP-based system for malware detection that uses machine learning while being extensible and explainable.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Labeling NIDS Rules with MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: Machine Learning vs. Large Language Models
On a dataset of 973 Snort rules, traditional ML models (SVM, F1 up to 0.87) outperformed ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini (best F1 0.62) at labeling rules with MITRE ATT&CK techniques.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.