Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Successive Prompting for Decomposing Complex Questions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.04092 v1 pith:RFUEVGKN submitted 2022-12-08 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords complexquestionssupervisionansweringpromptingquestionsuccessiveintermediate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Answering complex questions that require making latent decisions is a challenging task, especially when limited supervision is available. Recent works leverage the capabilities of large language models (LMs) to perform complex question answering in a few-shot setting by demonstrating how to output intermediate rationalizations while solving the complex question in a single pass. We introduce ``Successive Prompting'', where we iteratively break down a complex task into a simple task, solve it, and then repeat the process until we get the final solution. Successive prompting decouples the supervision for decomposing complex questions from the supervision for answering simple questions, allowing us to (1) have multiple opportunities to query in-context examples at each reasoning step (2) learn question decomposition separately from question answering, including using synthetic data, and (3) use bespoke (fine-tuned) components for reasoning steps where a large LM does not perform well. The intermediate supervision is typically manually written, which can be expensive to collect. We introduce a way to generate a synthetic dataset which can be used to bootstrap a model's ability to decompose and answer intermediate questions. Our best model (with successive prompting) achieves an improvement of ~5% absolute F1 on a few-shot version of the DROP dataset when compared with a state-of-the-art model with the same supervision.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CRISP: Complex Reasoning with Interpretable Step-based Plans

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A small model fine-tuned on CRISP, a filtered dataset of high-level plans, generates plans that improve downstream math and code benchmarks more than few-shot prompting of larger models.

  2. RecCoT: Enhancing Recommendation via Chain-of-Thought

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A slow-large, fast-small framework that generates chain-of-thought explanations from reviews and caches the resulting semantic embeddings improves Amazon rating prediction over several baselines.

Pith tools