REVIEW 2 cited by
The unstable formula theorem revisited via algorithms
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper is about the surprising interaction of a foundational result from model theory, about stability of theories, with algorithmic stability in learning. First, in response to gaps in existing learning models, we introduce a new statistical learning model, called ``Probably Eventually Correct'' or PEC. We characterize Littlestone (stable) classes in terms of this model. As a corollary, Littlestone classes have frequent short definitions in a natural statistical sense. In order to obtain a characterization of Littlestone classes in terms of frequent definitions, we build an equivalence theorem highlighting what is common to many existing approximation algorithms, and to the new PEC. This is guided by an analogy to definability of types in model theory, but has its own character. Drawing on these theorems and on other recent work, we present a complete algorithmic analogue of Shelah's celebrated Unstable Formula Theorem, with algorithmic properties taking the place of the infinite.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Private List Learnability vs. Online List Learnability
Online k-list learnability does not imply differentially private k-list learnability for k>1, disproving a natural extension of the multiclass equivalence.
-
Sign-Rank, Index, and List Replicability: Connections and Separations
Sign-rank is not bounded by Z2-index: projective-plane incidence matrices have Z2-index at most 5 and sign-rank growing polynomially, via the ordering Index ≤ 2·list-replicability − 1.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.