Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The unstable formula theorem revisited via algorithms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.05050 v3 pith:O7DEAAJV submitted 2022-12-09 math.LO cs.DMcs.LGcs.LOmath.CO

classification math.LOcs.DMcs.LGcs.LOmath.CO
keywords modelalgorithmicclasseslearninglittlestonetheoremalgorithmsdefinitions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper is about the surprising interaction of a foundational result from model theory, about stability of theories, with algorithmic stability in learning. First, in response to gaps in existing learning models, we introduce a new statistical learning model, called ``Probably Eventually Correct'' or PEC. We characterize Littlestone (stable) classes in terms of this model. As a corollary, Littlestone classes have frequent short definitions in a natural statistical sense. In order to obtain a characterization of Littlestone classes in terms of frequent definitions, we build an equivalence theorem highlighting what is common to many existing approximation algorithms, and to the new PEC. This is guided by an analogy to definability of types in model theory, but has its own character. Drawing on these theorems and on other recent work, we present a complete algorithmic analogue of Shelah's celebrated Unstable Formula Theorem, with algorithmic properties taking the place of the infinite.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Private List Learnability vs. Online List Learnability

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Online k-list learnability does not imply differentially private k-list learnability for k>1, disproving a natural extension of the multiclass equivalence.

  2. Sign-Rank, Index, and List Replicability: Connections and Separations

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Sign-rank is not bounded by Z2-index: projective-plane incidence matrices have Z2-index at most 5 and sign-rank growing polynomially, via the ordering Index ≤ 2·list-replicability − 1.

Pith tools