Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Randomized benchmarking with random quantum circuits

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.06181 v3 pith:VQ2GZFPW submitted 2022-12-12 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords protocolsrandomcircuitsfilteredquantumbenchmarkinggatesgeneral
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In its many variants, randomized benchmarking (RB) is a broadly used technique for assessing the quality of gate implementations on quantum computers. A detailed theoretical understanding and general guarantees exist for the functioning and interpretation of RB protocols if the gates under scrutiny are drawn uniformly at random from a compact group. In contrast, many practically attractive and scalable RB protocols implement random quantum circuits with local gates randomly drawn from some gate-set. Despite their abundance in practice, for those non-uniform RB protocols, general guarantees for gates from arbitrary compact groups under experimentally plausible assumptions are missing. In this work, we derive such guarantees for a large class of RB protocols for random circuits that we refer to as filtered RB. Prominent examples include linear cross-entropy benchmarking, character benchmarking, Pauli-noise tomography and variants of simultaneous RB. Building upon recent results for random circuits, we show that many relevant filtered RB schemes can be realized with random quantum circuits in linear depth, and we provide explicit small constants for common instances. We further derive general sample complexity bounds for filtered RB. We show filtered RB to be sample-efficient for several relevant groups, including protocols addressing higher-order cross-talk. Our theory for non-uniform filtered RB is, in principle, flexible enough to design new protocols for non-universal and analog quantum simulators.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Anticoncentration and State Design of Doped Real Clifford Circuits and Tensor Networks

    quant-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Real stabilizer states follow a new "orthogonal Clifford Porter–Thomas" overlap distribution, reached by shallow real-Clifford circuits in log depth; one imaginary state recovers unitary-Clifford statistics, polylog m...

  2. Anti-concentration is (almost) all you need

    quant-ph 2025-10 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    For LU-invariant local random quantum circuits, anti-concentration implies a relative-error state 2-design with error ≈ 4× the anti-concentration error, making the two properties equivalent.

Pith tools