Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

What do Vision Transformers Learn? A Visual Exploration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.06727 v1 pith:QU3LUUWR submitted 2022-12-13 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords vitsfeaturesinformationlayerstransformersvisionarchitectureconvolutional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Vision transformers (ViTs) are quickly becoming the de-facto architecture for computer vision, yet we understand very little about why they work and what they learn. While existing studies visually analyze the mechanisms of convolutional neural networks, an analogous exploration of ViTs remains challenging. In this paper, we first address the obstacles to performing visualizations on ViTs. Assisted by these solutions, we observe that neurons in ViTs trained with language model supervision (e.g., CLIP) are activated by semantic concepts rather than visual features. We also explore the underlying differences between ViTs and CNNs, and we find that transformers detect image background features, just like their convolutional counterparts, but their predictions depend far less on high-frequency information. On the other hand, both architecture types behave similarly in the way features progress from abstract patterns in early layers to concrete objects in late layers. In addition, we show that ViTs maintain spatial information in all layers except the final layer. In contrast to previous works, we show that the last layer most likely discards the spatial information and behaves as a learned global pooling operation. Finally, we conduct large-scale visualizations on a wide range of ViT variants, including DeiT, CoaT, ConViT, PiT, Swin, and Twin, to validate the effectiveness of our method.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Token-Based Affordance Grounding with Large Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    TokAG selects the LVLM output token whose aggregated cross-attention is most concentrated on a CLIPSeg object mask, converting that map into a zero-shot affordance heatmap that outperforms weakly supervised baselines.

  2. Towards Distributed Neural Architectures

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A general routing framework lets each token take its own path through a network, matching dense baselines while enabling learned compute savings and interpretable path specialization.

  3. ToSA: Token Merging with Spatial Awareness

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A training-free token merging method that adds depth-derived spatial similarity to ToMe's bipartite soft matching, improving VQA accuracy at high token reduction rates.

  4. Mettle: Meta-Token Learning for Memory-Efficient Audio-Visual Adaptation

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Mettle distills frozen transformer layer features into compact meta-tokens via parallel cross-attention and linear projection, cutting training memory dramatically while retaining competitive accuracy on three audio-v...

Pith tools