Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Identifying and Explaining Safety-critical Scenarios for Autonomous Vehicles via Key Features

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.07566 v2 pith:X4LLYCFG submitted 2022-12-15 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords testfeaturesscenariosidentifyroadspaceunsafevehicles
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Ensuring the safety of autonomous vehicles (AVs) is of utmost importance and testing them in simulated environments is a safer option than conducting in-field operational tests. However, generating an exhaustive test suite to identify critical test scenarios is computationally expensive as the representation of each test is complex and contains various dynamic and static features, such as the AV under test, road participants (vehicles, pedestrians, and static obstacles), environmental factors (weather and light), and the road's structural features (lanes, turns, road speed, etc.). In this paper, we present a systematic technique that uses Instance Space Analysis (ISA) to identify the significant features of test scenarios that affect their ability to reveal the unsafe behaviour of AVs. ISA identifies the features that best differentiate safety-critical scenarios from normal driving and visualises the impact of these features on test scenario outcomes (safe/unsafe) in 2D. This visualization helps to identify untested regions of the instance space and provides an indicator of the quality of the test suite in terms of the percentage of feature space covered by testing. To test the predictive ability of the identified features, we train five Machine Learning classifiers to classify test scenarios as safe or unsafe. The high precision, recall, and F1 scores indicate that our proposed approach is effective in predicting the outcome of a test scenario without executing it and can be used for test generation, selection, and prioritization.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CRASH: Challenging Reinforcement-Learning Based Adversarial Scenarios For Safety Hardening

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An adversarial RL framework that both finds collision-inducing scenarios and retrains a motion planner against them, cutting crash rates in a two-vehicle highway simulator.

Pith tools