REVIEW 2 cited by
Improving Chess Commentaries by Combining Language Models with Symbolic Reasoning Engines
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Despite many recent advancements in language modeling, state-of-the-art language models lack grounding in the real world and struggle with tasks involving complex reasoning. Meanwhile, advances in the symbolic reasoning capabilities of AI have led to systems that outperform humans in games like chess and Go (Silver et al., 2018). Chess commentary provides an interesting domain for bridging these two fields of research, as it requires reasoning over a complex board state and providing analyses in natural language. In this work we demonstrate how to combine symbolic reasoning engines with controllable language models to generate chess commentaries. We conduct experiments to demonstrate that our approach generates commentaries that are preferred by human judges over previous baselines.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Communicating Chess Strategies in Natural Language
Natural-language verbalizations of pruned engine strategy trees improve human and LLM puzzle play, while pure concept lists and main-line-only evaluation understate strategy quality.
-
From Multimodal Perception to Strategic Reasoning: A Survey on AI-Generated Game Commentary
A survey that organizes AI-generated game commentary research into a taxonomy of three commentator capabilities and three commentary types, with a review of methods, datasets, and metrics.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.