REVIEW 1 cited by
A brief note on the Bayesian D-optimality criterion
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We consider finite-dimensional Bayesian linear inverse problems with Gaussian priors and additive Gaussian noise models. The goal of this note is to present a simple derivation of the well-known fact that solving the Bayesian D-optimal experimental design problem, i.e., maximizing the expected information gain, is equivalent to minimizing the log-determinant of posterior covariance operator. We focus on finite-dimensional inverse problems. However, the presentation is kept generic to facilitate extensions to infinite-dimensional inverse problems.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Multifidelity sensor placement in Bayesian state estimation problems
A budget-constrained greedy plus iterative algorithm selects cheap/expensive sensors to maximize Bayesian D-optimality and beats random designs in benchmark state estimation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.