Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 81 references

Approaching Kasteleyn transition in frustrated quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnets

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet can host emergent Kasteleyn criticality through an exact mapping to a tunable monomer-dimer model on the honeycomb lattice.

desk verdict Solid paper: the Kasteleyn crossover in a Heisenberg magnet is convincingly realized; the effective dimer mapping is derived, not fitted, and the only real soft spot is that thermodynamic-limit sharpening is shown for the effective model, not the quantum model. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.14382 v2 pith:22PCGAQ3 submitted 2026-01-20 cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.str-el

Katarina Karlova , Afonso Rufino , Taras Verkholyak , Nils Caci , Stefan Wessel , Jozef Strecka , Frederic Mila , Andreas Honecker This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el PACS 75.10.Jm05.50.+q75.40.Mg
keywords Kasteleyntransitiondimermodelmonomer-dimerfrustratedquantummagnetHeisenbergantiferromagnetdiamond-decoratedhoneycomblatticestringexcitationsspecificheatcrossover
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that the Kasteleyn transition, a classical statistical-mechanics phenomenon of proliferating string defects, can occur in a fully quantum, SU(2)-symmetric Heisenberg magnet. The authors study the spin-1/2 Heisenberg model on the diamond-decorated honeycomb lattice and argue that, in an anisotropic dimer-tetramer phase, the low-energy states map exactly onto hard dimers and monomers on the honeycomb lattice. That effective model has anisotropic dimer activities and an exponentially small, tunable monomer density, so it exhibits an arbitrarily sharp crossover version of the Kasteleyn transition rather than a true phase transition. A sympathetic reader should care because this would be the first realization of Kasteleyn-type criticality in an isotropic Heisenberg quantum magnet, bridging quantum magnetism and classical dimer statistical mechanics.

What carries the argument

The central object is the effective monomer-dimer model on the anisotropic honeycomb lattice, obtained by identifying each singlet tetramer with a dimer occupying a honeycomb bond, each singlet dimer with an empty bond, and each pair of free spins with a monomer. The partition function is Z = sum_C exp(-N_T Delta'/T) exp(-N_V Delta/T) 2^{N_M}, with Delta = J2 - 2J1 and Delta' = J2' - 2J1, imposing the hard constraint that every site is covered exactly once. This mapping reduces the quantum Heisenberg model to the classical hard-dimer problem, whose exact solution exhibits the Kasteleyn singularity, while the monomer terms enforce Lieb's theorem and convert the singularity into a sharp crosso

What would settle it

Compute the specific heat of the original Heisenberg model at J2 = 1.3, J2' = 1.32 on progressively larger clusters using dimer-basis quantum Monte Carlo down to T around 0.0289: if the low-temperature peak does not sharpen with system size and approach the exact EDM/EMDM predictions, or if triplet-dimer excitations are found to contribute at energies comparable to J2' - J2, the effective monomer-dimer mapping fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the low-temperature thermodynamics of the weakly anisotropic spin-1/2 Heisenberg model on the diamond-decorated honeycomb lattice are accurately captured by an effective monomer-dimer model on the honeycomb lattice. The ground-state singlet tetramers and singlet dimers map onto hard dimers, while pairs of unpaired spins map onto monomers carrying an extra twofold spin degeneracy. The anisotropy J2' - J2 acts as the dimer activity difference, and the exactly solved pure dimer limit gives a specific-heat singularity at the Kasteleyn temperature TK = (J2' - J2)/ln 2. Because the monomer density is finite but tunable to arbitrarily small values, the singularity

Load-bearing premise

The effective monomer-dimer description assumes that the only low-energy degrees of freedom are singlet tetramers, singlet dimers, and free monomer pairs, and that triplet-dimer excitations are high enough in energy to be irrelevant at the Kasteleyn crossover temperature; this was validated only on small clusters and by the gap structure, not in the thermodynamic limit of the original quantum model.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the mapping is correct, the low-temperature specific-heat peak of the Heisenberg model should sharpen with increasing system size and asymptotically approach the inverse-square-root divergence of the pure dimer model as the monomer density is tuned to zero.
  • The Kasteleyn temperature TK = (J2' - J2)/ln 2 is directly controlled by the lattice anisotropy, providing a tunable energy scale for the emergent critical crossover.
  • The crossover corresponds to the proliferation of string-like defects that connect monomers, visible in CTMRG snapshots as finite string segments terminating at monomers.
  • No true phase transition occurs at finite monomer density, consistent with the absence of a thermodynamic singularity in two-dimensional monomer-dimer models and with the Mermin-Wagner prohibition on SU(2) symmetry breaking.
  • The same mechanism extends to the diamond-decorated square lattice, but only for staggered (not columnar) anisotropy, indicating that the geometry of the distortion controls whether Kasteleyn physics emerges.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to apply a magnetic field to tune the monomer activity directly: since monomers carry free spin-1/2 degrees of freedom, a field would change their Boltzmann weight and could sharpen or soften the Kasteleyn crossover in a controlled way.
  • The authors' observation that only staggered anisotropy produces Kasteleyn enhancement suggests a design rule: any distortion that lifts the macroscopic degeneracy while preserving a bipartite dimer-covering structure may produce similar crossover criticality on other decorated lattices.
  • The mapping implies that the quantum model's low-temperature entropy, correlation length, and string content are all governed by classical dimer combinatorics, so measurements of the specific-heat peak position versus anisotropy could serve as a clean probe of the effective dimer activities.
  • The proposed organo-metallic realization, though not demonstrated, gives a concrete path: replacing the nonmagnetic hexacyanoferrate units in known coordination polymers with paramagnetic hexacyanometallates could yield a physical system where the predicted peak and its sharpening could be sought in specific-heat experiments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the diamond-decorated honeycomb lattice. In the dimer-tetramer (DT) phase, the authors show that a family of exact eigenstates—products of singlet dimers and singlet tetramers—maps onto monomer-dimer configurations on the honeycomb lattice. From this they derive an effective monomer-dimer model (EMDM) whose dimer activities are parameter-free expressions in the original couplings: Δ = J2 - 2J1, Δ' = J2' - 2J1, and monomer degeneracy 2. Exact diagonalization plus finite-temperature Lanczos (ED+FTLM) on N=32 systems, QMC on larger systems, transfer-matrix calculations, and CTMRG in the thermodynamic limit are used to analyze the specific heat. For a small anisotropy δ = J2' - J2, the EMDM develops a sharp crossover near the Kasteleyn temperature TK = δ/ln2, approaching the inverse-square-root singularity of the pure honeycomb dimer model as the monomer density becomes exponentially small. The paper argues that this provides an example of emergent Kasteleyn criticality in a frustrated SU(2) Heisenberg magnet, with possible extensions to the diamond-decorated square lattice and to organometallic coordination polymers.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a significant bridge between frustrated quantum magnetism and classical Kasteleyn criticality. The effective mapping is derived from the Hamiltonian with no fitted parameters, and the low-temperature specific heat of the quantum model is quantitatively reproduced by the EDM/EMDM on small clusters. The use of multiple complementary numerical methods (ED+FTLM, QMC, transfer matrix, CTMRG) and the exact benchmark of the pure dimer model are strengths. The paper is also honest about the fact that monomers round the transition in accordance with Lieb's theorem, and it frames the result as a tunable crossover rather than a true transition. The generalization to the square lattice and the connection to candidate materials increase its potential impact.

major comments (3)
  1. [End Matter, Eq. (2) and Fig. 6; footnote [56]] The load-bearing step is the claim that the EMDM faithfully represents the low-temperature thermodynamics of the Heisenberg model at the Kasteleyn crossover temperature. The manuscript itself concedes in footnote [56] that for J2=1.3, J2'=1.32 there are out-of-subspace excitations (e.g., Ntrip=5) at energies below the monomer excitations. The validation of the EMDM against ED+FTLM is limited to N=32, and the gaps in Fig. 6 are N=32 data only; no scaling of these gaps with system size is provided. Since the thermodynamic-limit sharpening of the peak is demonstrated in the classical EMDM, transferring this conclusion to the quantum model requires that the out-of-subspace gap remains large compared to TK=δ/ln2 as N→∞. Please provide a quantitative estimate (including multiplicities) of the contribution of these states at T≈TK, or a gap-scaling study, or explicitly restrict the sharp-crossov
  2. [Main text near Fig. 3 and Fig. 4] The statement that the low-temperature peak 'sharpens with increasing system size' is supported by comparing a 2×2 cluster (N=32) of the quantum model with an ∞×10 tube of the effective model. This is a comparison across two different models and geometries, not a finite-size scaling of the quantum model. The QMC data at N=288 cannot access the low-temperature peak, so the quantum-model evidence for sharpening is indirect. Please clarify explicitly that the system-size sharpening is a property demonstrated for the EMDM and that the corresponding quantum-model verification at larger N remains an open numerical problem. This distinction matters for the abstract's claim that the Heisenberg phase itself exhibits an arbitrarily sharp crossover version of the Kasteleyn transition.
  3. [Abstract and Conclusion] The phrase 'arbitrarily sharp crossover version of the Kasteleyn transition' is potentially overstrong. For a fixed anisotropy δ, the EMDM has a rounded peak with finite correlation length; the sharpness is achieved only in the joint limit δ→0 and T→0 with T∼TK. This is stated in the paper, but the abstract could be read as claiming a sharp feature at any small δ. Rephrasing as 'a crossover that can be made arbitrarily close to the Kasteleyn singularity by reducing the anisotropy' would be more precise and would better match the quantitative results in Fig. 4.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Footnote [56]] Typo: 'temperartures' should be 'temperatures'.
  2. [End Matter after Eq. (4)] The definition m = -Δ/2 - T ln2 is central to the monomer activity but the derivation is terse. A short sentence explaining the factor 2^NM and the normalization to the MD ground state would improve readability.
  3. [Fig. 1] The phase boundaries are said to come from DMRG on a 4×4 system (N=128). It would be useful to state the convergence criteria or to note the expected finite-size uncertainty on the phase-boundary positions, since the DT phase is the focus of the paper.
  4. [References] Reference [33] mixes a journal DOI with an arXiv identifier in an unusual format; please format consistently.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the effective dimer-model parameters are derived from the Heisenberg couplings, the Kasteleyn temperature is an external exact result, and the self-citations are methodological only.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained at the level of its central claim. The effective monomer-dimer partition function, End Matter Eq. (2), uses dimer activities Δ = J2 − 2J1 and Δ′ = J2′ − 2J1 obtained from the exact energies of singlet dimers and singlet tetramers in the original Heisenberg Hamiltonian, together with a monomer degeneracy 2 coming from free spin-1/2 degrees of freedom; these parameters are derived, not fitted to the data being predicted. The Kasteleyn temperature TK = δ/ln 2, Eq. (6), is taken from the external exact solution of the hard-dimer problem [9], and the EDM/EMDM are then solved by transfer-matrix and CTMRG methods and compared to ED+FTLM and sign-problem-free QMC data on the original model (Figs. 2–3): the agreement is a validation, not a fit. The self-citations to the authors' prior square-lattice work are used for numerical implementation details (ED sector decomposition, FTLM post-processing) and do not carry the load-bearing argument. The main soft spot—that the low-energy sector is assumed to be exhausted by singlet tetramers/dimers and monomers—is validated only on N = 32 and explicitly qualified in footnote [56], where the EMDM is admitted to lose quantitative accuracy at higher temperatures because other excitations lie below monomer energies. That is a correctness/robustness caveat about the extrapolation from the 32-site quantum model to the thermodynamic-limit effective model, not a circular reduction of the prediction to its inputs. The thermodynamic-limit sharpening is demonstrated in the effective model, and whether it transfers to the full quantum model at T ≈ TK remains an open extrapolation risk, but the paper does not rename a fit as a prediction or derive the Kasteleyn singularity from its own assumptions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the exact mapping of the DT phase to hard dimer coverings (established by Morita-Shibata) and on the assumption that low-temperature excitations are limited to singlet tetramers and monomer pairs. No parameters are fitted to data; the effective activities are derived from the Heisenberg couplings. No new particles or entities are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Total spin of each J2/J2' dimer is conserved
    Stated in the text after Eq. (1): 'The total spin of each dimer is a conserved quantity'. Follows from the equal J1 couplings of the two dimer sites to the monomeric sites, and underlies the division of the Hilbert space into singlet/triplet sectors.
  • domain assumption DT ground-state manifold maps exactly to dimer coverings of the honeycomb lattice
    Taken from Morita & Shibata (2016, ref 17) and used throughout; the paper relies on this exact mapping to build the effective dimer model.
  • domain assumption Low-energy excitations are only singlet tetramers and monomer pairs; triplet excitations are gapped
    Assumed in the effective monomer-dimer model, Eq. (2); partially validated by the ED excitation gaps in Fig. 6 (gap about 0.59 at J2 about 1.4) and by the numerical agreement at low T.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Approaching Kasteleyn transition in frustrated quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/22PCGAQ3

@misc{pith2026260114382,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Approaching Kasteleyn transition in frustrated quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/22PCGAQ3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.14382}
}
read the original abstract

We show that the Kasteleyn transition, the abrupt proliferation of infinite strings of defects in classical dimer and related models, can also be relevant for frustrated 2d quantum magnets. This is explicitly demonstrated in a phase of the spin-1/2 Heisenberg diamond-decorated honeycomb lattice where a family of exact eigenstates built as products of dimer and plaquette singlets can be mapped onto the dimer coverings of the honeycomb lattice. The low-temperature properties of this phase are accurately described by an effective dimer model with anisotropic activities and a small, tunable density of monomers, leading to an arbitrarily sharp crossover version of the Kasteleyn transition. The generalization to other geometries and the possibility to realize this model in organo-metallic compounds are briefly discussed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.14382 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Upper panel: Ground-state phase diagram of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Specific heat of the spin- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) the specific heat obtained from ED combined with FTLM for N = 32 spins. For various values of J2 and fixed J ′ 2 − J2 = 0.02, we observe three peaks at well separated temperatures (T ≈ 0.02, 0.1, and 0.7). To assess the validity of the ED+FTLM approach at higher temperatures and larger system sizes, we compare in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) shows the specific heat as a function of tem￾perature for various values of J2, revealing a sharp low￾temperature peak associated with dimer physics, followed by a broader maximum due to monomer excitations. The inset highlights the peak structure around the Kastel…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Part of the diamond-decorated honeycomb lattice [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. CTMRG snapshots of the effective monomer–dimer model (crosssection of size [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of two anisotropic diamond-decorated square and honeycomb lattices (top panels) and their [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Specific heat per spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [56]

    H. L. C. Grande, S. R. Salinas, and F. A. da Costa, Fermionic representation of two-dimensional dimer mod- els, Braz. J. Phys. 41, 86 (2011)

    2011

  2. [1]

    This phase remains massively degener- ate, but has no residual entropy, distinguishing it from typical highly frustrated states

    The sys- tem either favors a non-degenerate dimer-tetramer solid (DTS) phase, which has an ordered pattern of singlet tetramers on all vertical bonds, or the dimer-tetramer liquid (DTL) phase, where singlet tetramers form along diagonal bonds. This phase remains massively degener- ate, but has no residual entropy, distinguishing it from typical highly fru...

  3. [2]

    Lower panel: Schematic illustrations of the various phases characterized in the main text. On the decorated honeycomb lattice, Kasteleyn physics appears because the low-energy sector maps onto an effective dimer model on the honeycomb lattice, with however a small and tunable density of monomers. This implies that there cannot be a true Kasteleyn transitio...

  4. [3]

    This phase resembles classical ferrimagnetic order, but with a small quantum reduction of the magnetization

    For J2 = J ′ 2 < 0.9548, the system re- alizes the 2d-Lieb-Mattis (LM) phase, where all dimers are triplets and the monomeric spins are predominantly oriented in the opposite direction. This phase resembles classical ferrimagnetic order, but with a small quantum reduction of the magnetization. For J2 = J ′ 2 > 2, the system enters the monomer-dimer (MD) p...

  5. [4]

    The macroscopically degenerate DT phase then splits into two distinct regimes, compare Fig

  6. [5]

    This model is precisely the model for which Kasteleyn discovered the transition that bears his name [ 4, 9]

    If that is the case, the very same low-temperature peak should be present in a simple EDM description of the low-energy excitations with different energies on verti- cal and tilted bonds. This model is precisely the model for which Kasteleyn discovered the transition that bears his name [ 4, 9]. To extend this effective description to higher energies, we no...

    2020

  7. [6]

    Kasteleyn, The statistics of dimers on a lattice: I

    P. Kasteleyn, The statistics of dimers on a lattice: I. The number of dimer arrangements on a quadratic lattice, Physica 27, 1209 (1961)

    1961

  8. [7]

    H. N. V. Temperley and M. E. Fisher, Dimer problem in statistical mechanics-an exact result, Philos. Mag.-J. Theor. Exp. Appl. Phys. 6, 1061 (1961)

    1961

Show all 81 references
  1. [8]

    J. F. Nagle, C. S. O. Yokoi, and S. M. Bhattacharjee, Dimer models on anisotropic lattices, in Phase transitions and Critical Phenomena , Vol. 13, edited by C. Domb and J. Lebowitz (Academic Press Limited, London, 1989) Chap. 2, pp. 236–297

    1989

  2. [10]

    Kenyon, Lectures on dimers (2009), arXiv:0910.3129 [math.PR]

    R. Kenyon, Lectures on dimers (2009), arXiv:0910.3129 [math.PR]

    2009 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Coulomb phase

    C. L. Henley, The “Coulomb phase” in frustrated systems, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1, 179 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    Moessner and K

    R. Moessner and K. S. Raman, Quantum dimer models, in Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism: Materials, Ex- periments, Theory, edited by C. Lacroix, P. Mendels, and F. Mila (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg,

  5. [13]

    J. Shah, L. Shou, J. Shuler, and V. Galitski, Breakdown of the thermodynamic limit in quantum spin and dimer models (2025), arXiv:2506.15769 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2025 arXiv

  6. [14]

    P. W. Kasteleyn, Dimer statistics and phase transitions, J. Math. Phys. 4, 287 (1963)

    1963

  7. [15]

    F. Y. Wu, Remarks on the modified potassium dihydro- gen phosphate model of a ferroelectric, Phys. Rev. 168, 539 (1968)

    1968

  8. [16]

    J. F. Nagle, Critical points for dimer models with 3 2 -order transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1150 (1975)

    1975

  9. [17]

    E. H. Lieb, Exact solution of the F model of an antifer- roelectric, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 1046 (1967)

    1967

  10. [18]

    M. E. Fisher, On the dimer solution of planar Ising mod- els, J. Math. Phys. 7, 1776 (1966)

    1966

  11. [20]

    F. Y. Wu, Exactly soluble model of the ferroelectric phase transition in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 605 (1967)

    1967

  12. [21]

    Lhuillier and G

    C. Lhuillier and G. Misguich, Frustrated quantum mag- nets, in High Magnetic Fields: Applications in Condensed Matter Physics and Spectroscopy , edited by C. Berthier, L. P. Lévy, and G. Martinez (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001) pp. 161–190

    2001

  13. [22]

    Morita and N

    K. Morita and N. Shibata, Exact nonmagnetic ground state and residual entropy of S = 1 /2 Heisenberg dia- mond spin lattices, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85, 033705 (2016)

    2016

  14. [23]

    M. R. Mahapatra and R. Kumar, Exact staggered dimer ground state and its stability in a two-dimensional mag- net, Phys. Rev. B 110, 104402 (2024)

    2024

  15. [24]

    Wilkins and S

    N. Wilkins and S. Powell, Topological sectors, dimer cor- relations, and monomers from the transfer-matrix so- lution of the dimer model, Phys. Rev. E 104, 014145 (2021)

    2021

  16. [25]

    Wilkins and S

    N. Wilkins and S. Powell, Derivation of field theory for the classical dimer model using bosonization, Phys. Rev. E 107, 054126 (2023)

    2023

  17. [26]

    Powell, Quantum Kasteleyn transition, Phys

    S. Powell, Quantum Kasteleyn transition, Phys. Rev. B 105, 064413 (2022)

    2022

  18. [27]

    R. A. Borzi, F. A. Gómez Albarracín, H. D. Rosales, G. L. Rossini, A. Steppke, D. Prabhakaran, A. P. Mackenzie, D. C. Cabra, and S. A. Grigera, Intermediate magne- tization state and competing orders in Dy 2Ti2O7 and Ho2Ti2O7, Nat. Commun. 7, 12592 (2016)

    2016

  19. [28]

    Fennell, S

    T. Fennell, S. T. Bramwell, D. F. McMorrow, P. Manuel, and A. R. Wildes, Pinch points and Kasteleyn transitions in kagome ice, Nat. Phys. 3, 566 (2007)

    2007

  20. [29]

    L. D. C. Jaubert, J. T. Chalker, P. C. W. Holdsworth, and R. Moessner, Three-dimensional Kasteleyn transi- tion: Spin ice in a [100] field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 6 067207 (2008)

    2008

  21. [30]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of ferromag- netism or antiferromagnetism in one- or two-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1307 (1966)

    1966

  22. [31]

    Hirose, A

    Y. Hirose, A. Oguchi, and Y. Fukumoto, Exact realiza- tion of a quantum-dimer model in Heisenberg antiferro- magnets on a diamond-like decorated lattice, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85, 094002 (2016)

    2016

  23. [32]

    Hirose, A

    Y. Hirose, A. Oguchi, and Y. Fukumoto, Ground states of spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnets with frustration on a diamond-like-decorated square lattice, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 86, 014002 (2017)

    2017

  24. [33]

    Hirose, S

    Y. Hirose, S. Miura, C. Yasuda, and Y. Fukumoto, Ground-state properties of spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferro- magnets with frustration on the diamond-like-decorated square and triangular lattices, AIP Advances 8, 101427 (2018)

    2018

  25. [34]

    Hirose, A

    Y. Hirose, A. Oguchi, and Y. Fukumoto, Quantum dimer model containing Rokhsar-Kivelson point expressed by spin- 1 2 Heisenberg antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 101, 174440 (2020)

    2020

  26. [35]

    N. Caci, K. Karl’ová, T. Verkholyak, J. Strečka, S. Wes- sel, and A. Honecker, Phases of the spin- 1 2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the diamond-decorated square lattice in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 107, 115143 (2023)

    2023

  27. [36]

    Karl’ová, A

    K. Karl’ová, A. Honecker, N. Caci, S. Wessel, J. Strečka, and T. Verkholyak, Thermodynamic properties of the macroscopically degenerate tetramer-dimer phase of the spin- 1 2 Heisenberg model on the diamond-decorated square lattice, Phys. Rev. B 110, 214429 (2024)

    2024

  28. [37]

    D. V. Dmitriev, V. Y. Krivnov, and O. A. Vasilyev, Macroscopic ground state degeneracy of the Heisenberg model with ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic interac- tions on diamond-decorated lattices, Phys. Rev. B 112, 094426 (2025)

    2025

  29. [38]

    D. V. Dmitriev, V. Y. Krivnov, and O. A. Vasi- lyev, Phase diagram and macroscopic ground state degeneracy of frustrated spin-1/2 anisotropic Heisen- berg model on diamond-decorated lattices, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A doi:10.1515/zna-2025-0334 (2026), https://doi.org/10...

    2025 doi

  30. [39]

    Zhang, Y.-X

    H.-X. Zhang, Y.-X. Tong, Z.-N. Chen, K.-B. Yu, and B.-S. Kang, Cyano-bridged extended heteronuclear supramolecular architectures with hexacyanoferrates(II) as building blocks, J. Organomet. Chem. 598, 63 (2000)

    2000

  31. [40]

    Trávníček, Z

    Z. Trávníček, Z. Smékal, A. Escuer, and J. Marek, Synthesis, structure and magnetic behaviour of a two-dimensional cyano-bridged complex [{Cu(ept)} 3Fe (CN)6](ClO4)2 · 5H2O [ept = N -(2-aminoethyl)-1,3-di- aminopropane], New J. Chem. 25, 655 (2001)

    2001

  32. [41]

    O. J. Heilmann and E. H. Lieb, Monomers and dimers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 1412 (1970)

    1970

  33. [42]

    Otsuka, Classical dimer model with anisotropic inter- actions on the square lattice, Phys

    H. Otsuka, Classical dimer model with anisotropic inter- actions on the square lattice, Phys. Rev. E 80, 011140 (2009)

    2009

  34. [43]

    S. Li, W. Li, and Z. Chen, Kosterlitz-Thouless transitions and phase diagrams of the interacting monomer-dimer model on a checkerboard lattice, Phys. Rev. E 90, 052104 (2014)

    2014

  35. [44]

    Otsuka, Monomer-dimer mixture on a honeycomb lat- tice, Phys

    H. Otsuka, Monomer-dimer mixture on a honeycomb lat- tice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 227204 (2011)

    2011

  36. [45]

    Otsuka, Emergent criticalities and phase transitions in a monomer–dimer mixture on a honeycomb lattice, J

    H. Otsuka, Emergent criticalities and phase transitions in a monomer–dimer mixture on a honeycomb lattice, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 63, 493 (2013)

    2013

  37. [46]

    Jaklič and P

    J. Jaklič and P. Prelovšek, Finite-temperature conduc- tivity in the planar t-J model, Phys. Rev. B 50, 7129 (1994)

    1994

  38. [47]

    Prelovšek and J

    P. Prelovšek and J. Bonča, Ground state and finite temperature Lanczos methods, in Strongly Correlated Systems: Numerical Methods , edited by A. A vella and F. Mancini (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013) pp. 1–30

    2013

  39. [48]

    Wietek, P

    A. Wietek, P. Corboz, S. Wessel, B. Normand, F. Mila, and A. Honecker, Thermodynamic properties of the Shastry-Sutherland model throughout the dimer-product phase, Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033038 (2019)

    2019

  40. [49]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992)

    1992

  41. [50]

    A. W. Sandvik and J. Kurkijärvi, Quantum Monte Carlo simulation method for spin systems, Phys. Rev. B 43, 5950 (1991)

    1991

  42. [51]

    O. F. Syljuåsen and A. W. Sandvik, Quantum Monte Carlo with directed loops, Phys. Rev. E 66, 046701 (2002)

    2002

  43. [52]

    A. W. Sandvik and O. F. Syljuåsen, The directed-loop algorithm, AIP Conf. Proc. 690, 299 (2003)

    2003

  44. [53]

    Stapmanns, P

    J. Stapmanns, P. Corboz, F. Mila, A. Honecker, B. Nor- mand, and S. Wessel, Thermal critical points and quan- tum critical end point in the frustrated bilayer Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 127201 (2018)

    2018

  45. [54]

    Weber, A

    L. Weber, A. Honecker, B. Normand, P. Corboz, F. Mila, and S. Wessel, Quantum Monte Carlo simulations in the trimer basis: first-order transitions and thermal critical points in frustrated trilayer magnets, SciPost Phys. 12, 054 (2022)

    2022

  46. [55]

    There we also provide complementary results for the diamond- decorated square lattice

    See Supplemental Material for details on ED, FTLM, CTMRG, and the transfer-matrix methods. There we also provide complementary results for the diamond- decorated square lattice

  47. [57]

    Nishino and K

    T. Nishino and K. Okunishi, Corner transfer matrix renormalization group method, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 891 (1996)

    1996

  48. [58]

    Orús, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Ann

    R. Orús, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 349, 117 (2014)

    2014

  49. [59]

    Bauer, L

    B. Bauer, L. D. Carr, H. G. Evertz, A. Feiguin, J. Freire, S. Fuchs, L. Gamper, J. Gukelberger, E. Gull, S. Guertler, A. Hehn, R. Igarashi, S. V. Isakov, D. Koop, P. N. Ma, P. Mates, H. Matsuo, O. Parcol- let, G. Pawłowski, J. D. Picon, L. Pollet, E. Santos, V. W. Scarola, U. ...

    2011

  50. [60]

    G. H. Wannier, Antiferromagnetism. The triangular Ising net, Phys. Rev. 79, 357 (1950)

    1950

  51. [61]

    6, such that the EMDM no longer yields a quantitatively ac- curate description either at these higher temperartures

    Note, however, that for J2 = 1 .3, there are further exci- tations at energies below the monomer ones, see Fig. 6, such that the EMDM no longer yields a quantitatively ac- curate description either at these higher temperartures

  52. [62]

    Lacroix, P

    C. Lacroix, P. Mendels, and F. Mila, eds., Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism , Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, Vol. 164 (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011). 7

    2011

  53. [63]

    H. T. Diep, Frustrated Spin Systems , 3rd ed. (World Sci- entific, 2020)

    2020

  54. [64]

    W. Nernst, Ueber die Berechnung chemischer Gle- ichgewichte aus thermischen Messungen, Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse 1906, 1 (1906)

    1906

  55. [65]

    K. Ueda, R. Otani, Y. Nishio, A. Gendiar, and T. Nishino, Snapshot Observation for 2D Classical Lat- tice Models by Corner Transfer Matrix Renormalization Group, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74, 111 (2005)

    2005

  56. [66]

    Approaching Kasteleyn transition in frustrated quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnets

    A. Rufino, S. Nyckees, J. Colbois, and F. Mila, Topolog- ical devil’s staircase in a constrained kagome Ising anti- ferromagnet (2025), arXiv:2505.05889 [cond-mat.str-el] . 8 J 1 J 2 J ' 2 FIG. 5. Part of the diamond-decorated honeycomb lattice with the unit cell shown in the y...

    2025

  57. [67]

    Until this point, the procedure for both non-uniform models with columnar and staggered anisotropies are identical

    can be expressed as Z = e−βE (0) MD yNc/2Tr [ ∏ Ly i=1 Vi,i+1 ] . Until this point, the procedure for both non-uniform models with columnar and staggered anisotropies are identical. Differences arise only when specifying the explicit form of the transfer matrix for each case. C...

  58. [68]

    (7) The total transfer matrix can be accordingly written as Vtotal = (V evenV odd)Ly/2 = V Ly , where V 2 = V even 3 V2[V odd 3 ]†[V2]†

    above and the operators V odd/even 3 are defined as V odd 3 = exp   Lx/2∑ i=1 [ α1σ− 2i−1σ− 2i + α2σ− 2iσ− 2i+1 ]   , V even 3 = exp   Lx/2∑ i=1 [ α2σ− 2i−1σ− 2i + α1σ− 2iσ− 2i+1 ]   . (7) The total transfer matrix can be accordingly written as Vtotal = (V evenV odd)Ly/...

  59. [69]

    by substituting therein the largest eigenvalue of the transfer matrix ( 8). COLUMNAR AND ST AGGERED DIMER MODELS ON THE SQUARE LA TTICE: EXACT RESUL TS In case of closely-packed dimers, the problem reduces to a pure dimer model without monomer contributions, which admits exact...

  60. [70]

    explicit, we need to adjust the notation ∆V = J ′ 2 − 2J1, ∆H2 = J2 − 2J1, and, consequently, α2 = e−β(J2−J ′ 2). 6

  61. [71]

    N. Caci, K. Karl’ová, T. Verkholyak, J. Strečka, S. Wessel, and A. Honecker, Phases of the spin- 1 2 Heisenberg antiferro- magnet on the diamond-decorated square lattice in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 107, 115143 (2023)

    2023

  62. [72]

    Karl’ová, A

    K. Karl’ová, A. Honecker, N. Caci, S. Wessel, J. Strečka, and T. Verkholyak, Thermodynamic properties of the macroscop- ically degenerate tetramer-dimer phase of the spin- 1 2 Heisenberg model on the diamond-decorated square lattice, Phys. Rev. B 110, 214429 (2024)

    2024

  63. [73]

    Jaklič and P

    J. Jaklič and P. Prelovšek, Finite-temperature conductivity in the planar t-J model, Phys. Rev. B 50, 7129 (1994)

    1994

  64. [74]

    Prelovšek and J

    P. Prelovšek and J. Bonča, Ground state and finite temperature Lanczos methods, in Strongly Correlated Systems: Nu- merical Methods , edited by A. A vella and F. Mancini (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013) pp. 1–30

    2013

  65. [75]

    Wietek, P

    A. Wietek, P. Corboz, S. Wessel, B. Normand, F. Mila, and A. Honecker, Thermodynamic properties of the Shastry- Sutherland model throughout the dimer-product phase, Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033038 (2019)

    2019

  66. [76]

    Morita and N

    K. Morita and N. Shibata, Exact nonmagnetic ground state and residual entropy of S = 1 /2 Heisenberg diamond spin lattices, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85, 033705 (2016)

    2016

  67. [77]

    Otsuka, Classical dimer model with anisotropic interactions on the square lattice, Phys

    H. Otsuka, Classical dimer model with anisotropic interactions on the square lattice, Phys. Rev. E 80, 011140 (2009)

    2009

  68. [78]

    E. H. Lieb, Solution of the dimer problem by the transfer matrix method, J. Math. Phys. 8, 2339 (1967)

    1967

  69. [79]

    F. Y. Wu, Dimers on two-dimensional lattices, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 20, 5357 (2006)

    2006

  70. [80]

    N. S. Izmailian, C.-K. Hu, and R. Kenna, Exact solution of the dimer model on the generalized finite checkerboard lattice, Phys. Rev. E 91, 062139 (2015)

    2015

  71. [81]

    Chen, C.-K

    C.-N. Chen, C.-K. Hu, N. S. Izmailian, and M.-C. Wu, Specific heat and partition function zeros for the dimer model on the checkerboard b lattice: Finite-size effects, Phys. Rev. E 99, 012102 (2019)

    2019

  72. [82]

    Indeed, all DT ground states are topologically equivalent for the N = 40 square lattice

  73. [83]

    H. L. C. Grande, S. R. Salinas, and F. A. da Costa, Fermionic representation of two-dimensional dimer models, Braz. J. Phys. 41, 86 (2011)

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.