Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

AI Emergency Preparedness: Examining the federal government's ability to detect and respond to AI-related national security threats

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.17347 v2 pith:22XYIJCU submitted 2024-07-03 cs.CY

classification cs.CY
keywords threatspreparednessemergencyabilityfederalgovernmentimprovenational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We examine how the federal government can enhance its AI emergency preparedness: the ability to detect and prepare for time-sensitive national security threats relating to AI. Emergency preparedness can improve the government's ability to monitor and predict AI progress, identify national security threats, and prepare effective response plans for plausible threats and worst-case scenarios. Our approach draws from fields in which experts prepare for threats despite uncertainty about their exact nature or timing (e.g., counterterrorism, cybersecurity, pandemic preparedness). We focus on three plausible risk scenarios: (1) loss of control (threats from a powerful AI system that becomes capable of escaping human control), (2) cybersecurity threats from malicious actors (threats from a foreign actor that steals the model weights of a powerful AI system), and (3) biological weapons proliferation (threats from users identifying a way to circumvent the safeguards of a publicly-released model in order to develop biological weapons.) We evaluate the federal government's ability to detect, prevent, and respond to these threats. Then, we highlight potential gaps and offer recommendations to improve emergency preparedness. We conclude by describing how future work on AI emergency preparedness can be applied to improve policymakers' understanding of risk scenarios, identify gaps in detection capabilities, and form preparedness plans to improve the effectiveness of federal responses to AI-related national security threats.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bare Minimum Mitigations for Autonomous AI Development

    cs.CY 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A position paper proposing two thresholds and four minimum safeguards for frontier AI labs before AI agents automate AI R&D.

Pith tools