Pith. sign in

REVIEW

PINN for Dynamical Partial Differential Equations is Not Training Deeper Networks Rather Learning Advection and Time Variance

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.04793 v1 pith:3S6PYBXE submitted 2023-01-12 physics.comp-ph cs.NAmath.DSmath.NA

classification physics.comp-phcs.NAmath.DSmath.NA
keywords dynamicalequationsnetworkadvectiondeeperdifferentialfailsidentified
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The concepts and techniques of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) is studied and limitations are identified to make it efficient to approximate dynamical equations. Potential working research domains are explored for increasing the robustness of this technique for the solvability of partial differential equations. It is identified that PINNs potentially fails to stronger advection and longer time duration. Also, optimization function and constraint posing needs to be smarter. Even a shallow network is good for a lot of problems while powerful deeper network fails. Reservoir computing based recurrent neural network architecture is recommended to solve dynamical problems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools