Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The Path from the Chinese and Japanese Observations of Supernova 1181 AD, to a Type Iax Supernova, to the Merger of CO and ONe White Dwarfs

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics · Submitted 12 Jan 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim I collect my new evidences with literature results to make a confident case to connect the East-Asian observations to a supernova, then to Pa 30, then to a low-luminosity Type Iax SN, then to the only possible explosion mechanism as a merger between CO and ONe white dwarfs.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2301.04807 (version 2)
Pith IDSNFLB4NS, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBradley E. Schaefer. "The Path from the Chinese and Japanese Observations of Supernova 1181 AD, to a Type Iax Supernova, to the Merger of CO and ONe White Dwarfs." arXiv:2301.04807 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/SNFLB4NS
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,042 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.09 · states limitation 0.12 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.41 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In 1181 AD, Chinese and Japanese observers reported an unmoving bright `Guest Star' in the constellation Chuanshe, visible for 185 days. In 2013, D. Patchick discovered what turned out to be a unique nebula surrounding a unique star, with the structure named `Pa 30', while subsequent workers made connections to mergers of white dwarfs, to the supernova subclass of low-luminosity Type Iax, and to the 1181 transient. Here, I provide a wide range of new observational evidence: First, detailed analysis of the original Chinese and Japanese reports places the `Guest Star' of 1181 into a small region with the only interesting source being Pa 30. Second, the ancient records confidently place the peak magnitude as 0.0$>$$V_{\rm peak}$$>$$-$1.4, and hence peak absolute magnitude $-$14.5$>$$M_{{\rm V,peak}}$$>$$-$16.0 mag. Third, the Pa 30 central star is fading from $B$=14.9 in 1889, to $B$=16.20 in 1950, to $B$=16.58 in 2022. Fourth, recent light curves show typical variability with full-amplitude of 0.24 mag on time-scales of one day and longer, critically with no coherent modulations for periods from 0.00046--10 days to strict limits. Fifth, the spectral energy distribution from the far-infrared to the ultraviolet is a nearly-perfect power-law with $F_{\nu}\propto\nu^{0.99\pm0.07}$, observed luminosity 128$\pm$24 L$_{\odot}$, and absolute magnitude $M_{\rm V}$=$+$1.07. I collect my new evidences with literature results to make a confident case to connect the East-Asian observations to a supernova, then to Pa 30, then to a low-luminosity Type Iax SN, then to the only possible explosion mechanism as a merger between CO and ONe white dwarfs.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In 1181 AD, Chinese and Japanese observers reported an unmoving bright `Guest Star' in the constellation Chuanshe, visible for 185 days. In 2013, D. background 1.00 0.06 0.02 asserted 0.99
s1 Patchick discovered what turned out to be a unique nebula surrounding a unique star, with the structure named `Pa 30', while subsequent workers made connections to mergers of white dwarfs, to the supernova subclass of low-luminosity Type Iax, and to the 1181 transient. background 0.97 0.13 0.13 asserted 0.99
s2 Here, I provide a wide range of new observational evidence: First, detailed analysis of the original Chinese and Japanese reports places the `Guest Star' of 1181 into a small region with the only interesting source being Pa 30. contribution 0.85 0.89 0.10 asserted 1.00
s3 Second, the ancient records confidently place the peak magnitude as 0.0$>$$V_{\rm peak}$$>$$-$1.4, and hence peak absolute magnitude $-$14.5$>$$M_{{\rm V,peak}}$$>$$-$16.0 mag. result 0.96 0.68 0.04 asserted 1.00
s4 Third, the Pa 30 central star is fading from $B$=14.9 in 1889, to $B$=16.20 in 1950, to $B$=16.58 in 2022. result 0.98 0.44 0.02 asserted 1.00
s5 Fourth, recent light curves show typical variability with full-amplitude of 0.24 mag on time-scales of one day and longer, critically with no coherent modulations for periods from 0.00046--10 days to strict limits. result 0.99 0.58 0.03 asserted 1.00
s6 Fifth, the spectral energy distribution from the far-infrared to the ultraviolet is a nearly-perfect power-law with $F_{\nu}\propto\nu^{0.99\pm0.07}$, observed luminosity 128$\pm$24 L$_{\odot}$, and absolute magnitude $M_{\rm V}$=$+$1.07. result 0.99 0.81 0.05 asserted 1.00
s7 I collect my new evidences with literature results to make a confident case to connect the East-Asian observations to a supernova, then to Pa 30, then to a low-luminosity Type Iax SN, then to the only possible explosion mechanism as a merger between CO and ONe white dwarfs. interpretation 0.86 0.60 0.95 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.98 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.61.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In 1181 AD, Chinese and Japanese observers reported an unmoving bright `Guest Star' in the constellation Chuanshe, visible for 185 days. In 2013, D. Patchick discovered what turned out to be a unique nebula surrounding a unique star, with the structure named `Pa 30', while subsequent workers made connections to mergers of white dwarfs, to the supernova subclass of low-luminosity Type Iax, and to the 1181 transient. Here, I provide a wide range of new observational evidence: First, detailed analysis of the original Chinese and Japanese reports places the `Guest Star' of 1181 into a small region with the only interesting source being Pa 30. Second, the ancient records confidently place the peak magnitude as 0.0$>$$V_{\rm peak}$$>$$-$1.4, and hence peak absolute magnitude $-$14.5$>$$M_{{\rm V,peak}}$$>$$-$16.0 mag. Third, the Pa 30 central star is fading from $B$=14.9 in 1889, to $B$=16.20 in 1950, to $B$=16.58 in 2022. Fourth, recent light curves show typical variability with full-amplitude of 0.24 mag on time-scales of one day and longer, critically with no coherent modulations for periods from 0.00046--10 days to strict limits. Fifth, the spectral energy distribution from the far-infrared to the ultraviolet is a nearly-perfect power-law with $F_{\nu}\propto\nu^{0.99\pm0.07}$, observed luminosity 128$\pm$24 L$_{\odot}$, and absolute magnitude $M_{\rm V}$=$+$1.07. I collect my new evidences with literature results to make a confident case to connect the East-Asian observations to a supernova, then to Pa 30, then to a low-luminosity Type Iax SN, then to the only possible explosion mechanism as a merger between CO and ONe white dwarfs.

Human review
How the literature uses it

5 arXiv papers cite this in 9 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 7 sentences without a confident label

Uses its data or values 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.