pith. sign in

arxiv: 2301.09771 · v6 · submitted 2023-01-24 · 💻 cs.CY · cs.GL

Automation and AI Technology in Surface Mining With a Brief Introduction to Open-Pit Operations in the Pilbara

Raymond Leung , Andrew J Hill , Arman Melkumyan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 10:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CY cs.GL
keywords open-pit miningautomationAIPilbarairon oresurface miningrobotic developmentresource development
0
0 comments X

The pith

Open-pit iron ore operations in the Pilbara consist of roughly nine steps from exploration to shipment, each presenting distinct challenges and opportunities for AI and automation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This survey article describes the engineering problems and automation efforts in surface mining, focusing on the Pilbara region. It categorizes the principal activities into resource development, mine, rail, and port operations, detailing roughly nine steps from mineral exploration to ore shipment. The paper aims to raise awareness of AI and automation trends for an engineering audience by building context through discussion of common open-pit operations. A sympathetic reader would care because understanding these processes highlights practical opportunities for technological innovation in a major industry. The insights come from a decade-long industry-university R&D partnership.

Core claim

The principal activities that take place in open-pit mining may be categorized in terms of resource development, mine-, rail- and port operations. From mineral exploration to ore shipment, there are roughly nine steps in between. These include geological assessment, mine planning and development, production drilling and assaying, blasting and excavation, transportation of ore and waste, crush and screen, stockpile and load-out, rail network distribution, and ore-car dumping. The objective is to describe these processes and provide insights on some of the challenges/opportunities from the perspective of a decade-long industry-university R&D partnership.

What carries the argument

The categorization of open-pit operations into nine sequential steps, used to map engineering challenges and AI/automation opportunities across resource development, mine, rail, and port phases.

Load-bearing premise

The nine-step categorization accurately and exhaustively represents the principal activities that take place in open-pit operations, and the decade-long partnership perspective provides representative insights into current engineering problems without selection bias.

What would settle it

A detailed audit of Pilbara open-pit operations showing a substantially different sequence or number of principal steps, or engineering challenges not aligned with those highlighted in the partnership view.

read the original abstract

This survey article provides a synopsis on some of the engineering problems, technological innovations, robotic development and automation efforts encountered in the mining industry -- particularly in the Pilbara iron-ore region of Western Australia. The goal is to paint the technology landscape and highlight issues relevant to an engineering audience to raise awareness of AI and automation trends in mining. It assumes the reader has no prior knowledge of mining and builds context gradually through focused discussion and short summaries of common open-pit mining operations. The principal activities that take place may be categorized in terms of resource development, mine-, rail- and port operations. From mineral exploration to ore shipment, there are roughly nine steps in between. These include: geological assessment, mine planning and development, production drilling and assaying, blasting and excavation, transportation of ore and waste, crush and screen, stockpile and load-out, rail network distribution, and ore-car dumping. The objective is to describe these processes and provide insights on some of the challenges/opportunities from the perspective of a decade-long industry-university R&D partnership.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. This survey article provides a synopsis on engineering problems, technological innovations, robotic development and automation efforts in the mining industry, particularly in the Pilbara iron-ore region of Western Australia. It assumes no prior knowledge of mining and builds context through focused discussion of common open-pit operations. The principal activities may be categorized in terms of resource development, mine-, rail- and port operations, with roughly nine steps from mineral exploration to ore shipment: geological assessment, mine planning and development, production drilling and assaying, blasting and excavation, transportation of ore and waste, crush and screen, stockpile and load-out, rail network distribution, and ore-car dumping. The objective is to describe these processes and provide insights on challenges/opportunities from the perspective of a decade-long industry-university R&D partnership.

Significance. If the process descriptions are accurate, the paper offers a useful introductory overview for an engineering audience unfamiliar with mining, explicitly framing its nine-step categorization as one possible approach ('may be categorized', 'roughly nine steps') and its partnership perspective as such from the outset. This avoids overclaiming exhaustiveness or representativeness. The gradual context-building and focus on practical AI/automation issues from an R&D partnership viewpoint are strengths for raising awareness in the field.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrasing 'roughly nine steps in between' followed by a list of exactly nine items creates minor ambiguity in counting (exploration to shipment); a brief clarification in the main text on whether the list is exhaustive or illustrative would improve precision without altering the descriptive intent.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive review, accurate summary of the manuscript's scope and objectives, and recommendation to accept.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely descriptive survey

full rationale

The paper is a survey article that describes open-pit mining processes and AI/automation trends from an industry-university partnership perspective. It presents the nine-step categorization explicitly as one possible framing ('may be categorized', 'roughly nine steps') rather than a derived or exhaustive model. No equations, predictions, fitted parameters, uniqueness theorems, or load-bearing self-citations appear. The text builds context through focused discussion of standard operations without any reduction of claims to inputs by construction. This is self-contained descriptive content with no circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a survey paper with no new derivations, fitted parameters, or postulated entities. No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5721 in / 1041 out tokens · 18770 ms · 2026-05-24T10:09:41.297449+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

195 extracted references · 195 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Brightmore,Rio Tinto: Innovation is the key to transforma- tion

    D. Brightmore,Rio Tinto: Innovation is the key to transforma- tion. Published by miningdigital (accessed: 2022-06-10)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Surface mining: Main research issues for au- tonomous operations,

    E. M. Nebot, “Surface mining: Main research issues for au- tonomous operations,” inRobotics Research, Springer, 2007, pp. 268–280

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    Dis- tributed large scale terrain mapping for mining and au- tonomous systems,

    P. Thompson, E. Nettleton, and H. Durrant-Whyte, “Dis- tributed large scale terrain mapping for mining and au- tonomous systems,” in2011 IEEE/RSJ International Confer- ence on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IEEE, 2011, pp. 4236– 4241

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    3D geological mod- elling using laser and hyperspectral data,

    J. I. Nieto, S. T. Monteiro, and D. Viejo, “3D geological mod- elling using laser and hyperspectral data,” in2010 IEEE In- ternational Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IEEE, 2010, pp. 4568–4571

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    A mine on its own—fully autonomous, remotely operated mine,

    S. Vasudevan, F. Ramos, E. Nettleton, and H. Durrant-Whyte, “A mine on its own—fully autonomous, remotely operated mine,”IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 63–73, 2010

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Robotics in mining,

    J. A. Marshall, A. Bonchis, E. Nebot, and S. Scheding, “Robotics in mining,” inSpringer Handbook of Robotics, Springer, 2016, pp. 1549–1576

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Map- building and map-based localization in an underground- minebystatisticalpatternmatching,

    R. Madhavan, G. Dissanayake, and H. Durrant-Whyte, “Map- building and map-based localization in an underground- minebystatisticalpatternmatching,”in Proceedings.Interna- tional Conference on Pattern Recognition (Cat. No. 98EX170), IEEE, vol. 2, 1998, pp. 1744–1746

    work page 1998

  8. [8]

    Autonomous control of underground mining vehicles using reactive navigation,

    J.M.Roberts,E.S.Duff,P.I.Corke,P.Sikka,G.J.Winstanley, and J. Cunningham, “Autonomous control of underground mining vehicles using reactive navigation,” inProceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Con- ference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No. 00CH37065), IEEE, vol. 4, 2000, pp. 3790–3795

    work page 2000

  9. [9]

    Towards autonomous excavation,

    A. T. Le, Q. Nguyen, Q. Ha,et al., “Towards autonomous excavation,” inField and Service Robotics, Springer, 1998, pp. 124–128

    work page 1998

  10. [10]

    Mil- limetre wave radar visualisation system: Practical approach to transforming mining operations,

    E. Widzyk-Capehart, G. Brooker, S. Scheding,et al., “Mil- limetre wave radar visualisation system: Practical approach to transforming mining operations,” inMechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice, Springer, 2008, pp. 139–165

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    Multi-goal planning for an autonomous blasthole drill,

    P. Elinas, “Multi-goal planning for an autonomous blasthole drill,” inNineteenth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, 2009

    work page 2009

  12. [12]

    Integrated planning and control of large tracked vehicles in open terrain,

    X. Fan, S. Singh, F. Oppolzer,et al., “Integrated planning and control of large tracked vehicles in open terrain,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, IEEE, 2010, pp. 4424–4430

    work page 2010

  13. [13]

    Durrant-Whyte, F

    H. Durrant-Whyte, F. T. Ramos, and P. J. Hatherly,Method and system for exploiting information from heterogeneous sources, US Patent 8,315,838, Nov. 2012

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    A. Hill, T. Albrecht, K. Seiler, A. Palmer, S. Scheding, and G. Callow, Mining system (Patent PCT/AU2018/051176, US16/764,731) filed: Oct 31, 2018, Jun. 2021

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    W.Jones, Ahybridmethodforcontrollingarailwaysystemand an apparatus therefor (Provisional patent AU2021902689), Technological Resources Pty Ltd., filed: August 24, 2021

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Vujanic, A

    R. Vujanic, A. Qadir, A. Hill, S. Scheding, and S. Sukkarieh, Building dispatch stockpiles with requisite chemical compo- nent composition (Australian Provisional Patent Application 2022900785) filed: March 28, 2022, Mar. 2022

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Nettleton, R

    E. Nettleton, R. Hennessy, H. Durrant-Whyte, A. H. Gökto- gan, S. P. Singh, and G. E. M. D. C. Bandara,Method and system for regulating movement of an entity between zones, US Patent 8,886,382, Nov. 2014

    work page 2014

  18. [18]

    E.Nettleton,R.Hennessy,H.Durrant-Whyte,A.H.Göktogan, and S. P. Singh,Control system for autonomous operation, US Patent 9,146,553, Sep. 2015

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Elinas and S

    P. Elinas and S. P. Singh,Drill hole planning, US Patent 9,129,236, Sep. 2015

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    16/165,151, Feb

    C.B.McHughandE.W.Nettleton, Methodof,andasystemfor, controlling a drilling operation, US Patent App. 16/165,151, Feb. 2019

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Nettleton, R

    E. Nettleton, R. Hennessy, H. Durrant-Whyte, A. H. Gökto- gan, P. J. Hatherly, and F. T. Ramos,Integrated automation system with picture compilation system, US Patent 9,297,256, Mar. 2016

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Silversides, R

    K. Silversides, R. Murphy, and D. Wyman,Determination of rock types by spectral scanning (Patent WO2011094818A1) filed: Feb 4, 2011, 2011

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    Silversides, A

    K. Silversides, A. Melkumyan, D. Wyman, and P. J. Hatherly, Systems and methods for processing geophysical data (Patent WO2013188911) filed: June 18, 2013, 2013

    work page 2013

  24. [25]

    AXT Pty Ltd. Automated Mineralogy Incubator aids tech- nology adoption. Published by mining.com (accessed: 2017- 06-13)

    “AXT Pty Ltd. Automated Mineralogy Incubator aids tech- nology adoption. Published by mining.com (accessed: 2017- 06-13).” (), [Online]. Available:https : / / www . mining . com / web / automated - mineralogy - incubator - aids - technology-adoption (visited on 06/13/2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [26]

    Housego,Rio: Mining should be the incubator for automa- tion

    L. Housego,Rio: Mining should be the incubator for automa- tion. Published by the Australian Financial Review (accessed: 2019-01-28)

    work page 2019

  26. [27]

    A comprehensive review of applications of drone technology in the mining industry,

    J. Shahmoradi, E. Talebi, P. Roghanchi, and M. Hassanalian, “A comprehensive review of applications of drone technology in the mining industry,”Drones, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 34, 2020

    work page 2020

  27. [28]

    Equinox’s Drones. How UAV and drone technology is in- fluencing mining operation (accessed: 2020-06-03)

    “Equinox’s Drones. How UAV and drone technology is in- fluencing mining operation (accessed: 2020-06-03).” (), [Online]. Available: https : / / www . equinoxsdrones . com / blog / how - uav - and - drone - technology - is - influencing - mining - operation (visited on 06/03/2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [29]

    Emesent. Hovermap for mining. (accessed: 2022-07-07)

    “Emesent. Hovermap for mining. (accessed: 2022-07-07).” (), [Online]. Available: https : / / www . emesent . com / industries/mining/ (visited on 07/07/2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [30]

    Simultaneous localization and mapping: Part I,

    H. Durrant-Whyte and T. Bailey, “Simultaneous localization and mapping: Part I,”IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 99–110, 2006

    work page 2006

  30. [31]

    Simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM): Part II,

    T. Bailey and H. Durrant-Whyte, “Simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM): Part II,”IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 108–117, 2006

    work page 2006

  31. [32]

    Scan-SLAM: Combin- ing EKF-SLAM and scan correlation,

    J. Nieto, T. Bailey, and E. Nebot, “Scan-SLAM: Combin- ing EKF-SLAM and scan correlation,” inField and Service Robotics, Springer, 2006, pp. 167–178

    work page 2006

  32. [33]

    On the linear and nonlinear observability analysis of the SLAM problem,

    L. D. Perera, A. Melkumyan, and E. Nettleton, “On the linear and nonlinear observability analysis of the SLAM problem,” in 2009 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics, IEEE, 2009, pp. 1–6

    work page 2009

  33. [34]

    Nonlinear observability of the centralized multi-vehicle SLAM problem,

    L. D. Perera and E. Nettleton, “Nonlinear observability of the centralized multi-vehicle SLAM problem,” in2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, IEEE, 2010, pp. 3171–3178

    work page 2010

  34. [35]

    An experiment in autonomous navigation of an underground mining vehicle,

    S. Scheding, G. Dissanayake, E. M. Nebot, and H. Durrant- Whyte, “An experiment in autonomous navigation of an underground mining vehicle,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 85–95, 1999

    work page 1999

  35. [36]

    Autonomous ex- ploration and mapping of abandoned mines,

    S. Thrun, S. Thayer, W. Whittaker,et al., “Autonomous ex- ploration and mapping of abandoned mines,”IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 79–91, 2004

    work page 2004

  36. [37]

    Using Lie group symmetries for fast corrective motion plan- ning,

    K. M. Seiler, S. P. Singh, S. Sukkarieh, and H. Durrant-Whyte, “Using Lie group symmetries for fast corrective motion plan- ning,”The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 151–166, 2012

    work page 2012

  37. [38]

    Gaussian process modeling of large-scale terrain,

    S. Vasudevan, F. Ramos, E. Nettleton, and H. Durrant-Whyte, “Gaussian process modeling of large-scale terrain,”Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 812–840, 2009

    work page 2009

  38. [39]

    Large-scale terrain modeling from multiple sensors with dependent gaussian processes,

    S. Vasudevan, F. Ramos, E. Nettleton, and H. Durrant-Whyte, “Large-scale terrain modeling from multiple sensors with dependent gaussian processes,” in2010 IEEE/RSJ Interna- tional Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IEEE, 2010, pp. 1215–1221

    work page 2010

  39. [40]

    A sparse covariance func- tion for exact gaussian process inference in large datasets,

    A. Melkumyan and F. T. Ramos, “A sparse covariance func- tion for exact gaussian process inference in large datasets,” in Int. Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2009

    work page 2009

  40. [41]

    Multi-kernel Gaussian pro- cesses,

    A. Melkumyan and F. Ramos, “Multi-kernel Gaussian pro- cesses,” inInternational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence (IJCAI), 2011

    work page 2011

  41. [42]

    Non-parametric Bayesian learning for resource estimation in the autonomous mine,

    A. Melkumyan and F. Ramos, “Non-parametric Bayesian learning for resource estimation in the autonomous mine,” in Proceedings, Applications of Computers and Operations Research in the Minerals Industries (APCOM), 2011, pp. 209– 215

    work page 2011

  42. [43]

    A non- parametric Bayesian framework for automatic block esti- mation,

    A. Jewbali, F. T. Ramos, and A. Melkumyan, “A non- parametric Bayesian framework for automatic block esti- mation,” inProceedings, Applications of Computers and Op- erations Research in the Minerals Industries (APCOM), 2011, pp. 1–20

    work page 2011

  43. [44]

    Evaluating classification techniques for mapping vertical geology using field-based hyperspectral sensors,

    R. J. Murphy, S. T. Monteiro, and S. Schneider, “Evaluating classification techniques for mapping vertical geology using field-based hyperspectral sensors,”IEEE Transactions on Geo- science and Remote Sensing, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 3066–3080, 2012

    work page 2012

  44. [45]

    Mapping the distribution of ferric iron minerals on a vertical mine face using deriva- tive analysis of hyperspectral imagery (430–970 nm),

    R. J. Murphy and S. T. Monteiro, “Mapping the distribution of ferric iron minerals on a vertical mine face using deriva- tive analysis of hyperspectral imagery (430–970 nm),”IS- PRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 75, pp. 29–39, 2013

    work page 2013

  45. [46]

    R. J. Murphy, A. Chlingaryan, and A. Melkumyan, “Gaussian processes for estimating wavelength position of the ferric iron crystal field feature at∼900 nm from hyperspectral imagery acquired in the short-wave infrared (1002–1355 nm),”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1907–1920, 2014

    work page 1907

  46. [47]

    Mapping clay minerals in an open-pit mine using hyperspectral and LiDAR data,

    R. J. Murphy, Z. Taylor, S. Schneider, and J. Nieto, “Mapping clay minerals in an open-pit mine using hyperspectral and LiDAR data,”European Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 511–526, 2015

    work page 2015

  47. [48]

    Evaluating the performance of a new classifier–the GP-OAD: A com- parison with existing methods for classifying rock type and mineralogy from hyperspectral imagery,

    S. Schneider, R. J. Murphy, and A. Melkumyan, “Evaluating the performance of a new classifier–the GP-OAD: A com- parison with existing methods for classifying rock type and mineralogy from hyperspectral imagery,”ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 98, pp. 145–156, 2014

    work page 2014

  48. [49]

    Hyperspectral remote sens- ing and geological applications,

    D. Ramakrishnan and R. Bharti, “Hyperspectral remote sens- ing and geological applications,”Current Science, pp. 879– 891, 2015

    work page 2015

  49. [50]

    Robinson, A

    D. Robinson, A. Melkumyan, and A. Chlingaryan, Esti- mating material properties (Patent WO2014/134655A8, US2016/0033676A1, AU2013/900742) filed: March 5, 2013, Dec. 2014

    work page 2013

  50. [51]

    Sample trun- cation strategies for outlier removal in geochemical data: The MCD robust distance approach versus t-SNE ensemble clustering,

    R. Leung, M. Balamurali, and A. Melkumyan, “Sample trun- cation strategies for outlier removal in geochemical data: The MCD robust distance approach versus t-SNE ensemble clustering,”MathematicalGeosciences,vol.53,no.1,pp.105– 130, 2021

    work page 2021

  51. [52]

    A com- parison of t-SNE, SOM and SPADE for identifying material type domains in geological data,

    M. Balamurali, K. L. Silversides, and A. Melkumyan, “A com- parison of t-SNE, SOM and SPADE for identifying material type domains in geological data,”Computers & Geosciences, vol. 125, pp. 78–89, 2019

    work page 2019

  52. [53]

    Geostatistical modeling of the geological uncertainty in an iron ore deposit,

    N. Mery, X. Emery, A. Cáceres, D. Ribeiro, and E. Cunha, “Geostatistical modeling of the geological uncertainty in an iron ore deposit,”Ore Geology Reviews, vol. 88, pp. 336–351, 2017

    work page 2017

  53. [54]

    Subsurface boundary geometry modeling: Ap- plying computational physics, computer vision, and signal processing techniques to geoscience,

    R. Leung, “Subsurface boundary geometry modeling: Ap- plying computational physics, computer vision, and signal processing techniques to geoscience,”IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 161680–161696, 2019

    work page 2019

  54. [55]

    Bayesian surface warping approach for rectifying geological boundaries using displacement likelihood and evidence from geochemical assays,

    R. Leung, A. Lowe, A. Chlingaryan, A. Melkumyan, and J. Zigman, “Bayesian surface warping approach for rectifying geological boundaries using displacement likelihood and evidence from geochemical assays,”ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–23, Mar. 2022

    work page 2022

  55. [56]

    Boundaryidentification and surface updates using MWD,

    K.L.SilversidesandA.Melkumyan,“Boundaryidentification and surface updates using MWD,”Mathematical Geosciences, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1047–1071, 2021

    work page 2021

  56. [57]

    Creating large scale probabilistic boundaries using Gaus- sian Processes,

    A. Ball, K. L. Silversides, A. Chlingaryan, and A. Melkumyan, “Creating large scale probabilistic boundaries using Gaus- sian Processes,”Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 199, p. 116959, 2022

    work page 2022

  57. [58]

    Geologist in the loop: A hybrid in- telligence model for identifying geological boundaries from augmented ground penetrating radar,

    A. Ball and L. O’Connor, “Geologist in the loop: A hybrid in- telligence model for identifying geological boundaries from augmented ground penetrating radar,”Geosciences, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 284, 2021

    work page 2021

  58. [60]

    Conditional ran- dom fields for rock characterization using drill measure- ments,

    S. T. Monteiro, F. Ramos, and P. Hatherly, “Conditional ran- dom fields for rock characterization using drill measure- ments,” in2009 International Conference on Machine Learn- ing and Applications, IEEE, 2009, pp. 366–371

    work page 2009

  59. [61]

    Spectral feature selection for automated rock recognition using gaussian process classification,

    H. Zhou, S. Monteiro, P. Hatherly, F. Ramos, E. Nettleton, and F. Oppolzer, “Spectral feature selection for automated rock recognition using gaussian process classification,” in Proceedings of Australian Conference on Robotics and Automa- tion, Citeseer, 2009

    work page 2009

  60. [62]

    Automated rock recognition with wavelet feature space projection and Gaussian Process classifica- tion,

    H. Zhou, S. T. Monteiro, P. Hatherly, F. Ramos, E. Nettleton, and F. Oppolzer, “Automated rock recognition with wavelet feature space projection and Gaussian Process classifica- tion,” in2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, IEEE, 2010, pp. 4444–4450

    work page 2010

  61. [63]

    A new methodology for the open-pit mine production scheduling problem,

    M. Samavati, D. Essam, M. Nehring, and R. Sarker, “A new methodology for the open-pit mine production scheduling problem,”Omega, vol. 81, pp. 169–182, 2018

    work page 2018

  62. [64]

    Improvements inplan-driventruckdispatchingsystemsforsurfacemining,

    M.Samavati,A.Palmer,A.Hill,andK.Seiler,“Improvements inplan-driventruckdispatchingsystemsforsurfacemining,” in Mining Goes Digital, CRC Press, 2019, pp. 357–366

    work page 2019

  63. [65]

    Produc- tion planning and scheduling in mining scenarios under ipcc mining systems,

    M. Samavati, D. Essam, M. Nehring, and R. Sarker, “Produc- tion planning and scheduling in mining scenarios under ipcc mining systems,”Computers & Operations Research, vol. 115, p. 104714, 2020

    work page 2020

  64. [66]

    Flow-achieving on- line planning and dispatching for continuous transportation with autonomous vehicles,

    K. M. Seiler, A. W. Palmer, and A. J. Hill, “Flow-achieving on- line planning and dispatching for continuous transportation with autonomous vehicles,”IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 457–472, Jan. 2022

    work page 2022

  65. [67]

    Multi-objective short-term production scheduling for open-pit mines: A hi- erarchical decomposition-based algorithm,

    M. Blom, A. R. Pearce, and P. J. Stuckey, “Multi-objective short-term production scheduling for open-pit mines: A hi- erarchical decomposition-based algorithm,”Engineering Op- timization, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 2143–2160, 2018

    work page 2018

  66. [68]

    Multi-task learn- ing of system dynamics with maximum information gain,

    J. F. Zubizarreta-Rodriguez and F. Ramos, “Multi-task learn- ing of system dynamics with maximum information gain,” in 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Au- tomation, IEEE, 2011, pp. 5709–5715

    work page 2011

  67. [69]

    Learning disturbances in autonomous excavation,

    G. J. Maeda and D. C. Rye, “Learning disturbances in autonomous excavation,” in2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IEEE, 2012, pp. 2599–2605

    work page 2012

  68. [70]

    Iterativeautonomous excavation,

    G.J.Maeda,D.C.Rye,andS.P.Singh,“Iterativeautonomous excavation,” inField and Service Robotics, Springer, 2014, pp. 369–382

    work page 2014

  69. [71]

    Combined ILC and disturbance observer for the rejection of near-repetitive disturbances, with application to excavation,

    G. J. Maeda, I. R. Manchester, and D. C. Rye, “Combined ILC and disturbance observer for the rejection of near-repetitive disturbances, with application to excavation,”IEEE Transac- tions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1754– 1769, 2015

    work page 2015

  70. [72]

    Experi- mental validation of structured receding horizon estimation and control for mobile ground robot slip compensation,

    N. D. Wallace, H. Kong, A. J. Hill, and S. Sukkarieh, “Experi- mental validation of structured receding horizon estimation and control for mobile ground robot slip compensation,” in Field and Service Robotics, Springer, 2021, pp. 411–426

    work page 2021

  71. [73]

    Estimation and tracking of excavated material in mining,

    C. Innes, E. Nettleton, and A. Melkumyan, “Estimation and tracking of excavated material in mining,” in14th Interna- tional Conference on Information Fusion, IEEE, 2011, pp. 1– 8

    work page 2011

  72. [74]

    Er- ror modeling and calibration of exteroceptive sensors for accurate mapping applications,

    J. P. Underwood, A. Hill, T. Peynot, and S. J. Scheding, “Er- ror modeling and calibration of exteroceptive sensors for accurate mapping applications,”Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 2–20, 2010

    work page 2010

  73. [75]

    A mutual information approach to automatic calibration of camera and lidar in natural environ- ments,

    Z. Taylor and J. Nieto, “A mutual information approach to automatic calibration of camera and lidar in natural environ- ments,” inAustralian Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2012, pp. 3–5

    work page 2012

  74. [76]

    Automatic calibration of lidar and camera images using normalized mutual information,

    Z. Taylor and J. Nieto, “Automatic calibration of lidar and camera images using normalized mutual information,” in Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, Citeseer, 2013

    work page 2013

  75. [77]

    Motion-based calibration of multi- modal sensor extrinsics and timing offset estimation,

    Z. Taylor and J. Nieto, “Motion-based calibration of multi- modal sensor extrinsics and timing offset estimation,”IEEE TransactionsonRobotics ,vol.32,no.5,pp.1215–1229,2016

    work page 2016

  76. [78]

    Ex- plicit 3D change detection using ray-tracing in spherical co- ordinates,

    J. P. Underwood, D. Gillsjö, T. Bailey, and V. Vlaskine, “Ex- plicit 3D change detection using ray-tracing in spherical co- ordinates,” in2013 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, IEEE, 2013, pp. 4735–4741

    work page 2013

  77. [79]

    Stereo-based motion de- tection and tracking from a moving platform,

    V. Romero-Cano and J. I. Nieto, “Stereo-based motion de- tection and tracking from a moving platform,” in2013 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), IEEE, 2013, pp. 499– 504

    work page 2013

  78. [80]

    Unsuper- visedmotionlearningfromamovingplatform,

    V. Romero-Cano, J. I. Nieto, and G. Agamennoni, “Unsuper- visedmotionlearningfromamovingplatform,”in 2013IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), IEEE, 2013, pp. 111– 115

    work page 2013

  79. [81]

    A varia- tional approach to simultaneous multi-object tracking and classification,

    V. Romero-Cano, G. Agamennoni, and J. Nieto, “A varia- tional approach to simultaneous multi-object tracking and classification,”The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 654–671, 2016

    work page 2016

  80. [82]

    Shadow com- pensation for outdoor perception,

    R. Ramakrishnan, J. Nieto, and S. Scheding, “Shadow com- pensation for outdoor perception,” in2015 IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE, 2015, pp. 4835–4842

    work page 2015

Showing first 80 references.