REVIEW 2 cited by
On Robustness of Prompt-based Semantic Parsing with Large Pre-trained Language Model: An Empirical Study on Codex
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Semantic parsing is a technique aimed at constructing a structured representation of the meaning of a natural-language question. Recent advancements in few-shot language models trained on code have demonstrated superior performance in generating these representations compared to traditional unimodal language models, which are trained on downstream tasks. Despite these advancements, existing fine-tuned neural semantic parsers are susceptible to adversarial attacks on natural-language inputs. While it has been established that the robustness of smaller semantic parsers can be enhanced through adversarial training, this approach is not feasible for large language models in real-world scenarios, as it requires both substantial computational resources and expensive human annotation on in-domain semantic parsing data. This paper presents the first empirical study on the adversarial robustness of a large prompt-based language model of code, \codex. Our results demonstrate that the state-of-the-art (SOTA) code-language models are vulnerable to carefully crafted adversarial examples. To address this challenge, we propose methods for improving robustness without the need for significant amounts of labeled data or heavy computational resources.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Fisher Random Walk: Automatic Debiasing Contextual Preference Inference for Large Language Model Evaluation
A Fisher random walk weighted residual estimator achieves semiparametric efficient confidence intervals for contextual Bradley-Terry-Luce preference comparisons with flexible score estimators.
-
Smaller = Weaker? Benchmarking Robustness of Quantized LLMs in Code Generation
Quantized code LLMs appear more robust than full-precision ones in a majority of tested adversarial and noise scenarios, but the proposed Relative Robustness Score is misspecified.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.