Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Rapid Identification and Classification of Eccentric Gravitational Wave Inspirals with Machine Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.00666 v2 pith:ITYZ3GT4 submitted 2023-02-01 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

classification gr-qcastro-ph.HE
keywords eccentricnetworkclassificationnon-eccentricproblemaccuracybandbest
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Current templated searches for gravitational waves (GWs) emanated from compact binary coalescences (CBCs) assume that the binaries have circularized by the time they enter the sensitivity band of the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) network. However, certain formation channels predict that in future observing runs (O4 and beyond), a fraction of detectable binaries could enter the sensitivity band with a measurable eccentricity $e$. Constraining $e$ for each GW event with Bayesian parameter estimation methods is computationally expensive and time-consuming. This motivates the need for a machine learning based identification and classification scheme, which could weed out the majority of GW events as non-eccentric and drastically reduce the set of candidate eccentric GWs. As a proof of principle, we train a separable-convolutional neural network (SCNN) with spectrograms of synthetic GWs added to Gaussian noise characterized by O4 representative \texttt{PSD}s. We use the trained network to (i) segregate candidates as either eccentric or non-eccentric (henceforth called the detection problem) and (ii) classify the events as non-eccentric $(e = 0)$, moderately eccentric $(e \in (0, 0.2])$, and highly eccentric $(e \in (0.2, 0.5])$. On the detection problem, our best performing network detects eccentricity with $0.914$ accuracy and true and false positive rates of $0.862$ and $0.138$, respectively. On the classification problem, the best performing network classifies signals with $0.853$ accuracy. We find that our trained detector displays close to ideal behavior for the data we consider.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Accurate waveforms for generic planar-orbit binary black holes: The multipolar effective-one-body model SEOBNRv6EHM

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    SEOBNRv6EHM is a multipolar EOB model for eccentric planar-orbit BBHs calibrated to NR simulations, showing low waveform mismatches up to eccentricity 0.9.

Pith tools