Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Conditioning Predictive Models: Risks and Strategies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.00805 v2 pith:QBHP5YO5 submitted 2023-02-02 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords modelspredictiveconditioningpredictapproachesbelievecarefullyeliciting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Our intention is to provide a definitive reference on what it would take to safely make use of generative/predictive models in the absence of a solution to the Eliciting Latent Knowledge problem. Furthermore, we believe that large language models can be understood as such predictive models of the world, and that such a conceptualization raises significant opportunities for their safe yet powerful use via carefully conditioning them to predict desirable outputs. Unfortunately, such approaches also raise a variety of potentially fatal safety problems, particularly surrounding situations where predictive models predict the output of other AI systems, potentially unbeknownst to us. There are numerous potential solutions to such problems, however, primarily via carefully conditioning models to predict the things we want (e.g. humans) rather than the things we don't (e.g. malign AIs). Furthermore, due to the simplicity of the prediction objective, we believe that predictive models present the easiest inner alignment problem that we are aware of. As a result, we think that conditioning approaches for predictive models represent the safest known way of eliciting human-level and slightly superhuman capabilities from large language models and other similar future models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Joint Scoring Rules: Zero-Sum Competition Avoids Performative Prediction

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Joint zero-sum scoring of multiple conditional predictors lets a principal deterministically take their most preferred action without performative manipulation.

Pith tools