Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Euclidean Adler Function and its Interplay with $\Delta\alpha^{\mathrm{had}}_{\mathrm{QED}}$ and $\alpha_s$

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.01359 v2 pith:A7RIX6LD submitted 2023-02-02 hep-ph hep-exhep-lat

classification hep-phhep-exhep-lat
keywords adleralphamathrmlatticedataeuclideanfunctionpqcd
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Three different approaches to precisely describe the Adler function in the Euclidean regime at around $2\, \mathrm{GeVs}$ are available: dispersion relations based on the hadronic production data in $e^+e^-$ annihilation, lattice simulations and perturbative QCD (pQCD). We make a comprehensive study of the perturbative approach, supplemented with the leading power corrections in the operator product expansion. All known contributions are included, with a careful assessment of uncertainties. The pQCD predictions are compared with the Adler functions extracted from $\Delta\alpha^{\mathrm{had}}_{\mathrm{QED}}(Q^2)$, using both the DHMZ compilation of $e^+e^-$ data and published lattice results. Taking as input the FLAG value of $\alpha_s$, the pQCD Adler function turns out to be in good agreement with the lattice data, while the dispersive results lie systematically below them. Finally, we explore the sensitivity to $\alpha_s$ of the direct comparison between the data-driven, lattice and QCD Euclidean Adler functions. The precision with which the renormalisation group equation can be tested is also evaluated.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools