REVIEW 1 cited by
Learning Interaction-aware Motion Prediction Model for Decision-making in Autonomous Driving
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Predicting the behaviors of other road users is crucial to safe and intelligent decision-making for autonomous vehicles (AVs). However, most motion prediction models ignore the influence of the AV's actions and the planning module has to treat other agents as unalterable moving obstacles. To address this problem, this paper proposes an interaction-aware motion prediction model that is able to predict other agents' future trajectories according to the ego agent's future plan, i.e., their reactions to the ego's actions. Specifically, we employ Transformers to effectively encode the driving scene and incorporate the AV's plan in decoding the predicted trajectories. To train the model to accurately predict the reactions of other agents, we develop an online learning framework, where the ego agent explores the environment and collects other agents' reactions to itself. We validate the decision-making and learning framework in three highly interactive simulated driving scenarios. The results reveal that our decision-making method significantly outperforms the reinforcement learning methods in terms of data efficiency and performance. We also find that using the interaction-aware model can bring better performance than the non-interaction-aware model and the exploration process helps improve the success rate in testing.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Goal-conditioned Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning for Sample-efficient and Safe Autonomous Driving at Intersections
A hierarchical RL agent with a goal-conditioned collision prediction module achieves 94.7% success and 3.3% collisions in SMARTS intersection tasks, outperforming flat RL baselines.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.