Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Hardware Impact of Quantization and Pruning for Weights in Spiking Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.04174 v1 pith:2HI2I3AO submitted 2023-02-08 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords quantizationpruningmodelefficientenergyhardwarenetworksneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Energy efficient implementations and deployments of Spiking neural networks (SNNs) have been of great interest due to the possibility of developing artificial systems that can achieve the computational powers and energy efficiency of the biological brain. Efficient implementations of SNNs on modern digital hardware are also inspired by advances in machine learning and deep neural networks (DNNs). Two techniques widely employed in the efficient deployment of DNNs -- the quantization and pruning of parameters, can both compress the model size, reduce memory footprints, and facilitate low-latency execution. The interaction between quantization and pruning and how they might impact model performance on SNN accelerators is currently unknown. We study various combinations of pruning and quantization in isolation, cumulatively, and simultaneously (jointly) to a state-of-the-art SNN targeting gesture recognition for dynamic vision sensor cameras (DVS). We show that this state-of-the-art model is amenable to aggressive parameter quantization, not suffering from any loss in accuracy down to ternary weights. However, pruning only maintains iso-accuracy up to 80% sparsity, which results in 45% more energy than the best quantization on our architectural model. Applying both pruning and quantization can result in an accuracy loss to offer a favourable trade-off on the energy-accuracy Pareto-frontier for the given hardware configuration.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Do Audio Language Models Use Paralinguistic Evidence? Counterfactual Audits for Response Evaluation

    cs.CL 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Counterfactual audits show that current audio-language model judges often recover paralinguistic contrasts when explicitly compared, but fail to use the same cues in native one-context judgments, so aggregate accuracy...

Pith tools