Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Gravitational wave constraints on non-birefringent dispersions of gravitational waves due to Lorentz violations with GWTC-3

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.05077 v1 pith:5F6ZA3MV submitted 2023-02-10 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

classification gr-qcastro-ph.HE
keywords lorentzdispersionmodifiedeffectsgravitationalpropagationrelationgauge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The standard model extension (SME) is an effective field theory framework that can be used to study the possible violations of Lorentz symmetry in the gravitational interaction. In the SME's gauge invariant linearized gravity sector, the dispersion relation of GWs is modified, resulting in anisotropy, birefringence, and dispersion effects in the propagation of GWs. In this paper, we mainly focus on the non-birefringent and anisotropic dispersion relation in the propagation of GWs due to the violation of Lorentz symmetry. With the modified dispersion relation, we calculate the corresponding modified waveform of GWs generated by the coalescence of compact binaries. We consider the effects from the operators with the lowest mass dimension $d=6$ in the gauge invariant linearized gravity sector of the SME which are expected to have the dominant Lorentz-violating effect on the propagation of GWs. For this case, the Lorentz-violating effects are presented by 25 coefficients and we constrain them independently by the ``maximal-reach" approach. We use 90 high-confidence GW events in the GWTC-3 catalog and use {\tt Bilby}, an open source software, and {\tt Dynest}, a nested sampling package, to perform parameter estimation with the modified waveform. We do not find any evidence of Lorentz violation in the GWs data and give a $90\%$ confidence interval for each Lorentz violating coefficient.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Lorentz Violation with Gravitational Waves: Constraints from NANOGrav and IPTA Data

    astro-ph.CO 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using NANOGrav 15-year and IPTA second data release, this paper sets a 68% confidence lower bound of 10^-19 GeV on the Lorentz-violating scale M_LV in a modified gravity model.

  2. Constraints on parity and Lorentz violations from gravitational waves: a comparison between single-parameter and multi-parameter analysis

    gr-qc 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Multi-parameter and single-parameter gravitational-wave analyses yield comparable parity and Lorentz violation constraints for three models, but degeneracies weaken the multi-parameter result when two parameters modif...

  3. Constraining Lorentz and parity violations in gravity with multiband gravitational wave observations

    gr-qc 2026-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Future multiband GW networks could tighten Lorentz- and parity-violation energy-scale bounds by up to several orders of magnitude, with massive binaries best for low-frequency and loud binaries for high-frequency effects.

Pith tools