Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Tuning computer vision models with task rewards

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.08242 v1 pith:RNQURRIV submitted 2023-02-16 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords computermodelsvisiontaskapproachmisalignmenttasksacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Misalignment between model predictions and intended usage can be detrimental for the deployment of computer vision models. The issue is exacerbated when the task involves complex structured outputs, as it becomes harder to design procedures which address this misalignment. In natural language processing, this is often addressed using reinforcement learning techniques that align models with a task reward. We adopt this approach and show its surprising effectiveness across multiple computer vision tasks, such as object detection, panoptic segmentation, colorization and image captioning. We believe this approach has the potential to be widely useful for better aligning models with a diverse range of computer vision tasks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Response Time Enhances Alignment with Heterogeneous Preferences

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Response times modeled as drift-diffusion processes enable consistent estimation of population-average preferences from heterogeneous anonymous binary choices.

  2. SpatialThinker: Reinforcing Scene Graph-Grounded Spatial Reasoning via Dense Rewards

    cs.CV 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Dense scene-graph-grounded rewards let a 7B multimodal LLM trained on 7K synthetic questions beat SFT and sparse-RL baselines and outscore GPT-4o on average across 12 spatial/real-world benchmarks.

  3. A Review On Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Lyapunov and Barrier Functions

    eess.SY 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A literature review of safe RL using Lyapunov and barrier functions that identifies a shift to model-free methods since 2017, well-defined open problems per approach class, and high-dimensional scalability as the main...

Pith tools