REVIEW 1 cited by
Search for Gravitational Waves from Scorpius X-1 in LIGO O3 Data With Corrected Orbital Ephemeris
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Improved observational constraints on the orbital parameters of the low-mass X-ray binary Scorpius~X-1 were recently published in Killestein et al (2023). In the process, errors were corrected in previous orbital ephemerides, which have been used in searches for continuous gravitational waves from Sco~X-1 using data from the Advanced LIGO detectors. We present the results of a re-analysis of LIGO detector data from the third observing run of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo using a model-based cross-correlation search. The corrected region of parameter space, which was not covered by previous searches, was about 1/3 as large as the region searched in the original O3 analysis, reducing the required computing time. We have confirmed that no detectable signal is present over a range of gravitational-wave frequencies from $25\textrm{Hz}$ to $1600\textrm{Hz}$, analogous to the null result of Abbott et al (2022). Our search sensitivity is comparable to that of Abbott et al (2022), who set upper limits corresponding, between $100\textrm{Hz}$ and $200\textrm{Hz}$, to an amplitude $h_0$ of about $10^{-25}$ when marginalized isotropically over the unknown inclination angle of the neutron star's rotation axis, or less than $4\times 10^{-26}$ assuming the optimal orientation.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Directional Search for Persistent Gravitational Waves: Results from the First Part of LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Fourth Observing Run
An 8.3-year LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA search for persistent, direction-dependent gravitational waves finds no signal and yields the most restrictive upper limits to date on anisotropic backgrounds and targeted sources.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.