Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Constraining gravitational wave propagation using pulsar timing array correlations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.11796 v2 pith:TR3PSLIV submitted 2023-02-23 gr-qc astro-ph.CO

classification gr-qcastro-ph.CO
keywords correlationsdatagravitationalpulsartimingwavearrayarrays
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Pulsar timing arrays (PTA) are a promising probe to the cosmologically novel nanohertz gravitational wave (GW) regime through the stochastic GW background. In this work, we consider subluminal GW modes as a possible source of correlations in a PTA, utilizing the public code PTAfast and the 12.5 years correlations data by NANOGrav, which we hypothesize are sourced by GWs. Our results show no evidence in support of tensor- or vector-induced GW correlations in the data, and that vector correlations are disfavored. This places an upper bound to the graviton mass, $m_{\rm g} \lesssim 10^{-22}$ eV, characteristic of the PTA GW energy scale.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Probing Graviton Mass with MeerKAT PTA and SKA--PTA Forecasts

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MPTA 4.5-year data imply a 90% upper bound of mg < 2.1 × 10−23 eV/c2, consistent with massless gravitons; SKA-PTA could reach ~10−25 eV/c2.

  2. Do Pulsar Timing Datasets Favor Massive Gravity?

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A one-parameter massive-gravity correlation curve gives lower chi-square than the Hellings-Downs curve for current pulsar-timing data, but the parameter is fitted to the data, so the result is not a prediction.

Pith tools