Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ChatGPT: A Meta-Analysis after 2.5 Months

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.13795 v1 pith:VSY7CDNT submitted 2023-02-20 cs.CL

Christoph Leiter , Ran Zhang , Yanran Chen , Jonas Belouadi , Daniil Larionov , Vivian Fresen , Steffen Eger This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CL
keywords chatgptperceptionsinceavailablehowevermediameta-analysismonths
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

ChatGPT, a chatbot developed by OpenAI, has gained widespread popularity and media attention since its release in November 2022. However, little hard evidence is available regarding its perception in various sources. In this paper, we analyze over 300,000 tweets and more than 150 scientific papers to investigate how ChatGPT is perceived and discussed. Our findings show that ChatGPT is generally viewed as of high quality, with positive sentiment and emotions of joy dominating in social media. Its perception has slightly decreased since its debut, however, with joy decreasing and (negative) surprise on the rise, and it is perceived more negatively in languages other than English. In recent scientific papers, ChatGPT is characterized as a great opportunity across various fields including the medical domain, but also as a threat concerning ethics and receives mixed assessments for education. Our comprehensive meta-analysis of ChatGPT's current perception after 2.5 months since its release can contribute to shaping the public debate and informing its future development. We make our data available.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ClusterFusion: Expanding Operator Fusion Scope for LLM Inference via Cluster-Level Collective Primitive

    cs.DC 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ClusterFusion fuses QKV projection, attention, and output projection into one kernel using Hopper cluster collectives, cutting average decoding latency by about 1.6x on an H100.

  2. An Efficient Private GPT Never Autoregressively Decodes

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Applying speculative decoding to secure two-party GPT inference, with a latency-insensitive multi-token forward and optimized private sampling, gives 2.1x to 6.0x speedups without changing the output distribution.

Pith tools