Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Observational constraints on noncold dark matter and phenomenological emergent dark energy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.00961 v2 pith:PIEFHZ7S submitted 2023-03-02 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords darkmattermodeldatapedelambdaparametersets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

It is well known that there are several long-standing problems implying the discordance of the $\Lambda$CDM model. Although most of the models proposed to resolve these problems assume that dark matter is pressureless, it is still possible that dark matter is not cold, as current observations have not ruled out this possibility yet. Therefore, in this article, we treat the dark matter equation of state parameter as a free parameter, and apply observational data to investigate the non-coldness of dark matter. Impressing by the simplicity of the phenomenological emergent dark energy (PEDE) and its ability to relieve the Hubble tension, we propose the PEDE+$w_{\rm dm}$ model based on PEDE and non-cold dark matter. We then place constraints on this model in light of the Planck 2018 Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropies, baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements, and the Pantheon compilation of Type Ia supernovae. The results indicate a preference for a negative dark matter equation of state parameter at $95\%$ CL for all data sets except CMB alone and CMB+BAO, which suggests that the non-coldness assumption of dark matter worth to be investigated further in order to understand the nature of dark matter. The Hubble tension is alleviated in this scenario compared to the $\Lambda$CDM model, with a significance below 3$\sigma$ level for all data sets except CMB+Pantheon. However, from the analysis based on Bayesian evidence, we clearly see that the data sets favor $\Lambda$CDM over the PEDE+$w_{\rm dm}$ model.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 14 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Is Dark Matter Really Matter?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using DESI DR2, DES supernovae, and two CMB likelihoods, the authors find wDM about 0.001 and wDE about -0.94 when varied jointly, a roughly 2-sigma joint preference away from Lambda-CDM, with a non-phantom Pade-w plu...

  2. Accelerating scaling solutions from dark matter particle creation

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Accelerating scaling attractors without dark energy appear only when the interaction is controlled by DM density and energy flows from DM to a barotropic fluid.

  3. Exploring non-cold dark matter in a scenario of dynamical dark energy with DESI DR2 data

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using DESI DR2, Planck, and supernova data, a nonzero dark matter equation of state is preferred at 2.8 to 3.3 sigma only when dark energy is assumed to have a constant equation of state.

  4. Alleviating the $H_0$ tension through the interacting dark energy model from quantum gravitational field theory in light of DESI DR2

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    With DESI DR2 BAO plus CMB and a SH0ES prior, the two-parameter eeΛCDM model gives δΛ=-0.41±0.14 and H0=71.9±1.0, easing the Hubble tension to 0.8σ, but SN datasets erase the signal.

Pith tools