pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.12627 · v2 · pith:53FRLH4Onew · submitted 2025-10-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-ph· hep-th

Alleviating the H₀ tension through the interacting dark energy model from quantum gravitational field theory in light of DESI DR2

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords lambdadatadeltadesitensionwidetildemodeldark
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recent DESI DR2 data has shown a significant preference for dynamical dark energy, yet this has further exacerbated the $H_0$ tension. In this work, we explore the potential of interacting dark energy models ($\widetilde{\Lambda}$CDM and $e\widetilde{\Lambda}$CDM) within the asymptotic-safety framework of quantum gravitational field theory to alleviate the $H_0$ tension. We perform observational constraints using the latest baryon acoustic oscillation data from DESI DR2, cosmic microwave background (CMB) data from Planck and ACT, and type Ia supernova data from DESY5 and PantheonPlus, as well as the SH0ES data. From our analysis, we observe the dynamical scale parameter of the cosmological constant, $\delta_{\Lambda} = -0.270\pm 0.100$, in the $e\widetilde{\Lambda}$CDM model using the CMB+DESI+SH0ES data, which deviates from $\Lambda$CDM at the $2.7\sigma$ level. Simultaneously, we find $H_0 = 70.84\pm 0.74~\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}}$, reducing the $H_0$ tension to $1.7\sigma$. This increase in the inferred $H_0$ is due to the anti-correlation between $\delta_{\Lambda}$ and $H_0$, whereby a negative $\delta_{\Lambda}$ leads to a higher $H_0$ value. Furthermore, for the CMB+DESI+SH0ES combination, we obtain $\Delta\chi^2_{\min}=-14.14$ and $\Delta\mathrm{DIC}=-9.18$, favoring the $e\widetilde{\Lambda}$CDM model over $\Lambda$CDM. Overall, the $e\widetilde{\Lambda}$CDM model can improve the fit and ease the $H_0$ tension, especially for the data combinations that provide the strongest statistical support.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 12 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Geometric Constraints on the Pre-Recombination Expansion History from the Hubble Tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Model-independent reconstruction shows that early-universe modifications resolving the Hubble tension exist at the background level, requiring a smooth ~15% pre-recombination expansion rate enhancement.

  2. Saturation Mechanisms in the Interacting Dark Sector

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Nonlinear dark-sector interaction models with a half-saturation sparseness scale are observationally preferred over their linear counterparts at >95% confidence for two of three cases.

  3. Double the axions, half the tension: multi-field early dark energy eases the Hubble tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Two-field axion-like early dark energy reduces Hubble tension to 1.5 sigma residual and improves high-ell CMB fits over single-field models.

  4. Evidence for deviation in gravitational light deflection from general relativity at cosmological scales with KiDS-Legacy and CMB lensing

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    KiDS-Legacy weak lensing plus CMB data yields a 3 sigma deviation in light deflection from GR in a Lambda CDM background, with the signal driven by large-scale CMB lensing amplitudes.

  5. Accelerating scaling solutions from dark matter particle creation

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Accelerating scaling attractors where DM and barotropic fluid coexist at late times arise only for DM-density-controlled interactions with energy transfer from DM.

  6. Measuring neutrino mass in light of ACT DR6 and DESI DR2

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    New ACT and DESI data yield model-dependent upper limits on sum of neutrino masses, with holographic dark energy giving the tightest bounds and a consistent preference for degenerate hierarchy.

  7. Synergy between CSST and third-generation gravitational-wave detectors: Inferring cosmological parameters using cross-correlation of dark sirens and galaxies

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Forecasts that cross-correlating 3G GW dark sirens with CSST photometric galaxies yields 1.04% precision on H0 and 2.04% on Omega_m while also constraining GW clustering bias.

  8. Dark energy, spatial curvature, and star formation efficiency from JWST photometric and spectroscopic high-redshift galaxies

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Bayesian joint constraints show that elevated star formation efficiency accounts for JWST high-z galaxy excess in flat Lambda CDM, without requiring deviations in dark energy equation of state or curvature.

  9. Cosmological constraints on the big bang quantum cosmology model

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The JCDM model yields H0 of 66.95 plus or minus 0.51 km/s/Mpc and Omega_m of 0.3419 plus or minus 0.0065 in a flat universe, rising to H0 of 69.13 plus or minus 0.56 with slight positive curvature, fitting late-time d...

  10. Revisiting the Hubble tension problem in the framework of holographic dark energy

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    HDE models with future event horizon IR cutoff partially ease the Hubble tension while Hubble-scale cutoffs do not, consistent across six models and multiple BAO/SN/CMB combinations.

  11. Beyond CPL: Evidence for dynamical dark energy in three-parameter models

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0

    Two three-parameter extensions of the mAH dark energy parametrization are compared to LambdaCDM, wCDM, CPL and others using CMB, DESI BAO, H(z), RSD and three SNIa samples, yielding Delta chi-squared improvements of 6...

  12. Dark Energy in the DESI Era: A Brief Review of Evidence, Beyond-$\Lambda$CDM Interpretations, and Tensions

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 1.0

    Review of DESI evidence for dynamical dark energy, its dependence on parametrization and datasets, and alternative beyond-LambdaCDM interpretations that may address cosmological tensions.