Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Exploring the Feasibility of ChatGPT for Event Extraction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.03836 v2 pith:D7VC4IVZ submitted 2023-03-07 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords chatgpteventextractiontaskscomplexlanguagechallengesexperiments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Event extraction is a fundamental task in natural language processing that involves identifying and extracting information about events mentioned in text. However, it is a challenging task due to the lack of annotated data, which is expensive and time-consuming to obtain. The emergence of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT provides an opportunity to solve language tasks with simple prompts without the need for task-specific datasets and fine-tuning. While ChatGPT has demonstrated impressive results in tasks like machine translation, text summarization, and question answering, it presents challenges when used for complex tasks like event extraction. Unlike other tasks, event extraction requires the model to be provided with a complex set of instructions defining all event types and their schemas. To explore the feasibility of ChatGPT for event extraction and the challenges it poses, we conducted a series of experiments. Our results show that ChatGPT has, on average, only 51.04% of the performance of a task-specific model such as EEQA in long-tail and complex scenarios. Our usability testing experiments indicate that ChatGPT is not robust enough, and continuous refinement of the prompt does not lead to stable performance improvements, which can result in a poor user experience. Besides, ChatGPT is highly sensitive to different prompt styles.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Keyword-Centric Prompting for One-Shot Event Detection with Self-Generated Rationale Enhancements

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A keyword-centric prompting method with self-generated propose-and-judge rationales improves one-shot event detection F1 by up to 12.8 points over prior in-context learning baselines.

  2. EXCEEDS: Extracting Complex Events via Nugget-based Grid Modeling in Scientific Domain

    cs.CL 2024-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Introduces the SciEvents dataset for scientific event extraction and the EXCEEDS nugget-grid modeling framework that reports state-of-the-art results on the new data.

Pith tools