REVIEW 3 cited by
Is Action Complexity better for de Sitter space in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Volume complexity in dS$_2$ remains $O(1)$ up to a critical time, after which it suddenly diverges. On the other hand, for the dS$_2$ solution in JT gravity there is a linear dilaton which smoothly grows towards the future infinity. From the dimensional reduction viewpoint, the growth of the dilaton is due to the expansion of the orthogonal sphere in higher-dimensional dS$_d$ ($d \ge 3$). Since in higher dimensions complexity becomes very large even before the critical time, by properly taking into account the dilaton, the same behavior is expected for complexity in dS$_2$ JT gravity. We show that this expectation is met by complexity = action (CA) conjecture. For this purpose, we obtain an appropriate action for dS$_2$ in JT gravity, by dimensional reduction from dS$_3$. In addition, we discuss complexity = "refined volume" where we choose an appropriate Weyl field-redefinition such that refined volume avoids the discontinuous jump in time evolution.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Cosmological pole-skipping, shock waves and quantum chaotic dynamics of de Sitter horizons
Pole-skipping in Schwarzschild-de Sitter predicts superluminal and imaginary butterfly velocities, confirmed by shock wave analysis, hinting at nonlocal and non-Hermitian dual dynamics.
-
De Sitter Complexity Grows Linearly in the Static Patch
Timelike extremal volume in the de Sitter static patch gives a holographic complexity that grows linearly with time and is proportional to horizon entropy times temperature.
-
A Dynamical Systems Framework for Reinforcement Learning Safety and Robustness Verification
The claimed RL safety verification framework is absent from the manuscript; the body text is an unrelated high-energy physics paper about de Sitter horizon chaos.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.