REVIEW 1 cited by
Live, Rich, and Composable: Qualities for Programming Beyond Static Text
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Efforts to push programming beyond static textual code have sought to imbue programming with multiple distinct qualities. One long-acknowledged quality is liveness: providing programmers with in-depth feedback about a program's dynamic behavior as the program is edited. A second quality, long-explored but lacking a shared term of art, is richness: allowing programmers to edit programs though domain-specific representations and interactions rather than solely through text. In this paper, we map the relationship between these two qualities and survey past work that exemplifies them. We observe that systems combining liveness and richness often do so at the cost of an essential quality of traditional programming: composability. We argue that, by combining liveness, richness, and composability, programming systems can better capture the full potential of interactive computation without leaving behind the expressivity of traditional code.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Code Shaping: Iterative Code Editing with Free-form AI-Interpreted Sketching
Free-form sketch annotations on and around code can be interpreted by a large language model to produce iterative code edits, and a three-stage study with 18 programmers yields design guidelines for this interaction paradigm.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.