REVIEW 2 cited by
Learning the language of QCD jets with transformers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Transformers have become the primary architecture for natural language processing. In this study, we explore their use for auto-regressive density estimation in high-energy jet physics, which involves working with a high-dimensional space. We draw an analogy between sentences and words in natural language and jets and their constituents in high-energy physics. Specifically, we investigate density estimation for light QCD jets and hadronically decaying boosted top jets. Since transformers allow easy sampling from learned densities, we exploit their generative capability to assess the quality of the density estimate. Our results indicate that the generated data samples closely resemble the original data, as evidenced by the excellent agreement of distributions such as particle multiplicity or jet mass. Furthermore, the generated samples are difficult to distinguish from the original data, even by a powerful supervised classifier. Given their exceptional data processing capabilities, transformers could potentially be trained directly on the massive LHC data sets to learn the probability densities in high-energy jet physics.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Generating particle physics Lagrangians with transformers
A BART transformer can generate gauge-invariant Lagrangians from field content with over 90% accuracy on in-distribution data, though its performance drops on realistic Standard Model benchmarks.
-
The fundamental limit of jet tagging: Beyond top jets
Using generative-model likelihood ratios, the authors estimate that modern taggers nearly reach the model-defined optimal limit for W, Z, and H-to-gg jets, while the top-jet gap remains large.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.