Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Efficient Bayesian Physics Informed Neural Networks for Inverse Problems via Ensemble Kalman Inversion

Machine Learning · Submitted 13 Mar 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We find that our proposed method can achieve inference results with informative uncertainty estimates comparable to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC)-based B-PINNs with a much reduced computational cost.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2303.07392 (version 1)
Pith IDKXXL2BQ3, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAndrew Pensoneault, Xueyu Zhu. "Efficient Bayesian Physics Informed Neural Networks for Inverse Problems via Ensemble Kalman Inversion." arXiv:2303.07392 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/KXXL2BQ3
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,950 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.11 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.67 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Bayesian Physics Informed Neural Networks (B-PINNs) have gained significant attention for inferring physical parameters and learning the forward solutions for problems based on partial differential equations. However, the overparameterized nature of neural networks poses a computational challenge for high-dimensional posterior inference. Existing inference approaches, such as particle-based or variance inference methods, are either computationally expensive for high-dimensional posterior inference or provide unsatisfactory uncertainty estimates. In this paper, we present a new efficient inference algorithm for B-PINNs that uses Ensemble Kalman Inversion (EKI) for high-dimensional inference tasks. We find that our proposed method can achieve inference results with informative uncertainty estimates comparable to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC)-based B-PINNs with a much reduced computational cost. These findings suggest that our proposed approach has great potential for uncertainty quantification in physics-informed machine learning for practical applications.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Bayesian Physics Informed Neural Networks (B-PINNs) have gained significant attention for inferring physical parameters and learning the forward solutions for problems based on partial differential equations. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 However, the overparameterized nature of neural networks poses a computational challenge for high-dimensional posterior inference. background 0.72 0.10 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 Existing inference approaches, such as particle-based or variance inference methods, are either computationally expensive for high-dimensional posterior inference or provide unsatisfactory uncertainty estimates. gap 0.75 0.05 0.03 asserted 1.00
s3 In this paper, we present a new efficient inference algorithm for B-PINNs that uses Ensemble Kalman Inversion (EKI) for high-dimensional inference tasks. contribution 0.88 0.81 0.11 asserted 1.00
s4 We find that our proposed method can achieve inference results with informative uncertainty estimates comparable to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC)-based B-PINNs with a much reduced computational cost. result 1.00 0.96 0.67 asserted 1.00
s5 These findings suggest that our proposed approach has great potential for uncertainty quantification in physics-informed machine learning for practical applications. interpretation 1.00 0.36 0.47 hedged possibility 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.97.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Bayesian Physics Informed Neural Networks (B-PINNs) have gained significant attention for inferring physical parameters and learning the forward solutions for problems based on partial differential equations. However, the overparameterized nature of neural networks poses a computational challenge for high-dimensional posterior inference. Existing inference approaches, such as particle-based or variance inference methods, are either computationally expensive for high-dimensional posterior inference or provide unsatisfactory uncertainty estimates. In this paper, we present a new efficient inference algorithm for B-PINNs that uses Ensemble Kalman Inversion (EKI) for high-dimensional inference tasks. We find that our proposed method can achieve inference results with informative uncertainty estimates comparable to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC)-based B-PINNs with a much reduced computational cost. These findings suggest that our proposed approach has great potential for uncertainty quantification in physics-informed machine learning for practical applications.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.