Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Network Anomaly Detection Using Federated Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.07452 v1 pith:46LRI47L submitted 2023-03-13 cs.LG cs.DC

classification cs.LGcs.DC
keywords learningnetworkfederatedanomalydetectionmachinetrainingcentralized
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Due to the veracity and heterogeneity in network traffic, detecting anomalous events is challenging. The computational load on global servers is a significant challenge in terms of efficiency, accuracy, and scalability. Our primary motivation is to introduce a robust and scalable framework that enables efficient network anomaly detection. We address the issue of scalability and efficiency for network anomaly detection by leveraging federated learning, in which multiple participants train a global model jointly. Unlike centralized training architectures, federated learning does not require participants to upload their training data to the server, preventing attackers from exploiting the training data. Moreover, most prior works have focused on traditional centralized machine learning, making federated machine learning under-explored in network anomaly detection. Therefore, we propose a deep neural network framework that could work on low to mid-end devices detecting network anomalies while checking if a request from a specific IP address is malicious or not. Compared to multiple traditional centralized machine learning models, the deep neural federated model reduces training time overhead. The proposed method performs better than baseline machine learning techniques on the UNSW-NB15 data set as measured by experiments conducted with an accuracy of 97.21% and a faster computation time.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools