Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Cloud Services Enable Efficient AI-Guided Simulation Workflows across Heterogeneous Resources

Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing · Submitted 15 Mar 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We show that these methods can achieve performance parity with systems that rely on direct connection between resources.

how it is stated · asserted 0.96 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2303.08803 (version 1)
Pith ID2K6PNDIK, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationGanesh Sivaraman, Ian Foster, J. Gregory Pauloski, Kyle Chard, Logan Ward, Rajeev Thakur, Ryan Chard, Sutanay Choudhury, Valerie Hayot-Sasson, Yadu Babuji. "Cloud Services Enable Efficient AI-Guided Simulation Workflows across Heterogeneous Resources." arXiv:2303.08803 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/2K6PNDIK
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,944 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.08 · states limitation 0.14 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.69 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.86 · mentions code or data availability 0.04.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Applications that fuse machine learning and simulation can benefit from the use of multiple computing resources, with, for example, simulation codes running on highly parallel supercomputers and AI training and inference tasks on specialized accelerators. Here, we present our experiences deploying two AI-guided simulation workflows across such heterogeneous systems. A unique aspect of our approach is our use of cloud-hosted management services to manage challenging aspects of cross-resource authentication and authorization, function-as-a-service (FaaS) function invocation, and data transfer. We show that these methods can achieve performance parity with systems that rely on direct connection between resources. We achieve parity by integrating the FaaS system and data transfer capabilities with a system that passes data by reference among managers and workers, and a user-configurable steering algorithm to hide data transfer latencies. We anticipate that this ease of use can enable routine use of heterogeneous resources in computational science.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Applications that fuse machine learning and simulation can benefit from the use of multiple computing resources, with, for example, simulation codes running on highly parallel supercomputers and AI training and inference tasks on specialized accelerators. background 1.00 0.06 0.04 hedged possibility 0.86
s1 Here, we present our experiences deploying two AI-guided simulation workflows across such heterogeneous systems. contribution 1.00 0.92 0.05 asserted 0.77
s2 A unique aspect of our approach is our use of cloud-hosted management services to manage challenging aspects of cross-resource authentication and authorization, function-as-a-service (FaaS) function invocation, and data transfer. contribution 0.76 0.89 0.09 asserted 0.98
s3 We show that these methods can achieve performance parity with systems that rely on direct connection between resources. result 1.00 0.93 0.47 asserted 0.96
s4 We achieve parity by integrating the FaaS system and data transfer capabilities with a system that passes data by reference among managers and workers, and a user-configurable steering algorithm to hide data transfer latencies. method 0.98 0.94 0.17 asserted 1.00
s5 We anticipate that this ease of use can enable routine use of heterogeneous resources in computational science. interpretation 0.76 0.08 0.33 hedged possibility 0.55

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.93 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.79.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Applications that fuse machine learning and simulation can benefit from the use of multiple computing resources, with, for example, simulation codes running on highly parallel supercomputers and AI training and inference tasks on specialized accelerators. Here, we present our experiences deploying two AI-guided simulation workflows across such heterogeneous systems. A unique aspect of our approach is our use of cloud-hosted management services to manage challenging aspects of cross-resource authentication and authorization, function-as-a-service (FaaS) function invocation, and data transfer. We show that these methods can achieve performance parity with systems that rely on direct connection between resources. We achieve parity by integrating the FaaS system and data transfer capabilities with a system that passes data by reference among managers and workers, and a user-configurable steering algorithm to hide data transfer latencies. We anticipate that this ease of use can enable routine use of heterogeneous resources in computational science.

Human review
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 4 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites

Uses data or values from 1 paper
Cites as background 1 paper
  • Following the lexicon of Jha et al. [ref] , there are at least “ML-in-HPC” applications where AI-based software are used inside conventional HPC applications (e.g., surrogates for expensive computational routines [ref] ) and “ML-out-HPC” where machine learning controls the execution of the application (e.g., steering a workflow via active learning [ref] ).

    AI-coupled HPC Workflows · AI-Integrated Workflows · 0.82

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.