REVIEW 5 cited by
A Short Survey of Viewing Large Language Models in Legal Aspect
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have transformed many fields, including natural language processing, computer vision, and reinforcement learning. These models have also made a significant impact in the field of law, where they are being increasingly utilized to automate various legal tasks, such as legal judgement prediction, legal document analysis, and legal document writing. However, the integration of LLMs into the legal field has also raised several legal problems, including privacy concerns, bias, and explainability. In this survey, we explore the integration of LLMs into the field of law. We discuss the various applications of LLMs in legal tasks, examine the legal challenges that arise from their use, and explore the data resources that can be used to specialize LLMs in the legal domain. Finally, we discuss several promising directions and conclude this paper. By doing so, we hope to provide an overview of the current state of LLMs in law and highlight the potential benefits and challenges of their integration.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Testing for LLM response differences: the case of a composite null consisting of semantically irrelevant query perturbations
A new hypothesis test for binary LLM responses treats semantically equivalent query perturbations as an unknown null set and gives asymptotic validity and consistency guarantees under a uniformity assumption.
-
Using Large Language Models for Legal Decision-Making in Austrian Value-Added Tax Law: An Experimental Study
RAG-enhanced LLMs slightly outperform fine-tuned LLMs on Austrian/EU VAT questions, but not significantly, and neither approach is ready for full automation.
-
Abstract Counterfactuals for Language Model Agents
Counterfactuals for LM agents computed over a high-level abstraction of the action, instead of its tokens, preserve the observed action's meaning across counterfactual contexts far more often than token-level counterfactuals.
-
When Large Language Models Meet Law: Dual-Lens Taxonomy, Technical Advances, and Ethical Governance
A literature review that classifies LLM-for-law research using a dual-lens taxonomy of Toulmin argumentation components and legal practitioner roles.
-
Charting the Future of Scholarly Knowledge with AI: A Community Perspective
A community perspective on how AI can support scholarly knowledge extraction, organization, and communication, with a proposed classification and ethical considerations.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.