Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Backdoor Attacks with Input-unique Triggers in NLP

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.14325 v1 pith:46QK5EIC submitted 2023-03-25 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords backdoorattacktriggersmodelinput-uniqueissuesattackingcreates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Backdoor attack aims at inducing neural models to make incorrect predictions for poison data while keeping predictions on the clean dataset unchanged, which creates a considerable threat to current natural language processing (NLP) systems. Existing backdoor attacking systems face two severe issues:firstly, most backdoor triggers follow a uniform and usually input-independent pattern, e.g., insertion of specific trigger words, synonym replacement. This significantly hinders the stealthiness of the attacking model, leading the trained backdoor model being easily identified as malicious by model probes. Secondly, trigger-inserted poisoned sentences are usually disfluent, ungrammatical, or even change the semantic meaning from the original sentence, making them being easily filtered in the pre-processing stage. To resolve these two issues, in this paper, we propose an input-unique backdoor attack(NURA), where we generate backdoor triggers unique to inputs. IDBA generates context-related triggers by continuing writing the input with a language model like GPT2. The generated sentence is used as the backdoor trigger. This strategy not only creates input-unique backdoor triggers, but also preserves the semantics of the original input, simultaneously resolving the two issues above. Experimental results show that the IDBA attack is effective for attack and difficult to defend: it achieves high attack success rate across all the widely applied benchmarks, while is immune to existing defending methods. In addition, it is able to generate fluent, grammatical, and diverse backdoor inputs, which can hardly be recognized through human inspection.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Paladin: Defending LLM-enabled Phishing Emails with a New Trigger-Tag Paradigm

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A trigger-tag watermark embedded by fine-tuning lets modified LLMs mark their own phishing outputs for cheap detection.

Pith tools