REVIEW 2 cited by
Direct searches for general dark matter-electron interactions with graphene detectors: Part I. Electronic structure calculations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We develop a formalism to describe electron ejections from graphene-like targets by dark matter (DM) scattering for general forms of scalar and spin 1/2 DM-electron interactions and compare their applicability and accuracy within the density functional theory (DFT) and tight binding (TB) approaches. This formalism allows for accurate prediction of the daily modulation signal expected from DM in upcoming direct detection experiments employing graphene sheets as the target material. A key result is that the physics of the graphene sheet and that of the DM and the ejected electron factorise, allowing for the rate of ejections from all forms of DM to be obtained with a single graphene response function. We perform a comparison between the TB and DFT approaches to modeling the initial state electronic wavefunction within this framework, with DFT emerging as the more self-consistent and reliable choice due to the challenges in the embedding of an appropriate atomic contribution into the TB approach.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Hydrogenated carbon structures as directional sub-GeV dark matter detectors
Hydrogenated carbon sheets and nanotube arrays could detect dark matter as light as ~1 MeV by counting protons knocked loose from hydrogen atoms.
-
First-principles upper bounds on dark matter-electron scattering rates from condensed matter sum rules
Dark matter-electron scattering rates in isotropic materials are bounded from above by a universal expression depending only on plasma frequency, mass density, and static dielectric function.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.