REVIEW 1 cited by
BC-IRL: Learning Generalizable Reward Functions from Demonstrations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
How well do reward functions learned with inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) generalize? We illustrate that state-of-the-art IRL algorithms, which maximize a maximum-entropy objective, learn rewards that overfit to the demonstrations. Such rewards struggle to provide meaningful rewards for states not covered by the demonstrations, a major detriment when using the reward to learn policies in new situations. We introduce BC-IRL a new inverse reinforcement learning method that learns reward functions that generalize better when compared to maximum-entropy IRL approaches. In contrast to the MaxEnt framework, which learns to maximize rewards around demonstrations, BC-IRL updates reward parameters such that the policy trained with the new reward matches the expert demonstrations better. We show that BC-IRL learns rewards that generalize better on an illustrative simple task and two continuous robotic control tasks, achieving over twice the success rate of baselines in challenging generalization settings.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Enhancing Rating-Based Reinforcement Learning to Effectively Leverage Feedback from Large Vision-Language Models
ERL-VLM learns a reward model from VLM-provided absolute ratings (bad/average/good) and uses it to train SAC and IQL agents, outperforming preference-based RL-VLM-F on most tested tasks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.